Air Borne Transmission of EBOLA

Nah, what they are talking about is droplet transmission.  True micro aerosol/droplet nuclei transmission of Ebola (as with measles, smallpox etc.) doesn't happen and likely won't.  Same for HIV, rabies etc.  

Most viruses do not spread via respiratory means.  It depends upon the virion geometry, envelope, size etc. as well as the normal infection pathway. 

Ebola is not primarily a respiratory infection, unlike influenza etc., so any respiratory transmission is incidental = droplet transmission vs. droplet nuclei. 

I've written extensively about it on the other forum, Ebola info.

You are right, this is not impossible and it does use the droplet infection route from time to time as well.  To say that ebola mutating to be airborne is unlikely, is something of an understatement though.  I would be less surprised to see a breed of domestic dog evolve wings and learn to ride the updrafts over the Rockies hunting the eagles that "used" to rule the roost.  Once again remotely possible, but not exactly likely.

'Lots more really likely things to worry about there.

Ebola if not airbourne never,

just keep watching with interest!!!!!!!

yep Deja vu.....lol

In answer to senario one: Ebola has evolved to target mammals as its host family.  It only targets specific species within that group.   It might theoretically be able to branch out to another family, or genus within the mammal family, but that is unlikely.  To cross the barriers into infecting the members of another kingdom of life (such as bacteria) would be impossible.

In answer to senario two:  It would be theoritically possible to bio-engineer a bacteria which ate ebola virius particles, but that would be quite a task and manufacturing a vaccine is an easier task for the scientists.  No such natural bacterium is known to science.

If you actually mean could ebola ride a bacterial infection to enter a body by the naso-pharangeal route.  Yes that could happen (at least in theory) if the bacterial infection had done enough damage already to have stripped away the mucus producing layers of cells.  It would have to be a flesh-eating bacteria, like MRSA to accomplish this.  This would require a co-infection (where the flesh eater got there first) and would possibly alert the immune system of the host earlier to the second infection with ebola, resulting in an improved prognosis.  This would be both highly unlikely and would not classify as airborne anyway. 

I think you can stop worrying about that one.