Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese

Forum Home Forum Home > Infectious Disease Tracking > Ebola Virus
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Disease ‘superspreaders’ accounted for nearly
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Online Discussion: Tracking new emerging diseases and the next pandemic.

Disease ‘superspreaders’ accounted for nearly

 Post Reply Post Reply
arirish View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group

Joined: June 19 2013
Location: Arkansas
Status: Offline
Points: 31285
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote arirish Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Disease ‘superspreaders’ accounted for nearly
    Posted: February 13 2017 at 1:12pm
Disease ‘superspreaders’ accounted for nearly two-thirds of Ebola cases, study finds

They are called the superspreaders, the minority of people who are responsible for infecting many others during epidemics of infectious diseases. Perhaps the most famous superspreader was Typhoid Mary, presumed to have infected 51 people, three of whom died, between 1900 and 1907.

Now scientists studying how Ebola spread during the 2014-2015 epidemic in West Africa say superspreaders played a bigger role than was previously known, according to findings published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.

If superspreading had been completely controlled, almost two-thirds of the infections might have been prevented, scientists said.

More than 28,000 confirmed, probable and suspected cases of Ebola were reported in West Africa during the outbreak, including more than 11,000 deaths, according to the World Health Organization.

Researchers at Princeton University and Oregon State University conducted a retrospective analysis of the timing and location of 200 community burials between October 2014 and March 2015 in the urban areas around Freetown, the capital of Sierra Leone.

Using a mathematical model, they reconstructed the transmission network to see what proportion of cases were caused by superspreaders. They estimated that about 3 percent of the people infected were ultimately responsible for infecting about 61 percent of cases.

“It’s similar to looking at a blood spatter pattern and figuring out where the shooter was standing,” he said.

Based on the evidence of disease transmission, that pattern — a small number of individuals responsible for the majority of infections — also holds true in Guinea and Liberia, the other two countries hit hardest by Ebola, said Benjamin Dalziel, an assistant professor of population biology at Oregon State University and a co-author of the study.

“Superspreading was more important in driving the epidemic than we realized,” he said.

Superspreaders of Ebola tended to be children younger than 15 or adults between 40 and 55 years old, he said. They were based in the community rather than in health-care facilities, and they continued to spread the disease after many of the people first infected were already in treatment centers, where transmission was much better controlled.

Older adults were most probably caring for the children. These caregivers were also more likely to be the people in charge of organizing large funerals, he said. Researchers said their findings about the importance of superspreaders were conservative because they focused only on people who had been buried safely.

Ebola spreads primarily through contact with bodily fluids. During the epidemic, superspreaders were cited in numerous news stories about Ebola’s spread. Often, transmission occurred during caregiving at home and during funeral preparations, especially washing and touching the bodies of loved ones.

Researchers said the study provides a new statistical framework that allowed scientists to measure how important superspreaders were in fueling the epidemic. In the future, public health officials should consider asking the question “What are the scenarios where superspreading might occur,” Dalziel said. Just asking that question might help tailor better methods of controlling an outbreak, he said.

Superspreaders have played a role in the spread of several other infectious diseases. During the 2002-2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, superspreading was considered one of the most notable features of the outbreak.

In one such event in Hong Kong, a 26-year-old sick man who was admitted to a hospital for treatment infected 156 people, including hospital staff, patients and visitors.

A single superspreader in a busy hospital emergency department also spread MERS, Middle East respiratory syndrome, to 82 people in just three days in May 2015 during an outbreak of the virus in South Korea.

The “index patient” was a 68-year-old man who had been to Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Qatar before returning to South Korea.

MERS first emerged in humans in 2012 and has been spreading in Saudi Arabia and neighboring countries since then. It is caused by a coronavirus from the same family as SARS. The virus, in which patients develop acute respiratory illness with fever, coughing and breathing problems, has spread to 27 countries and killed up to 40 percent of those infected.
Buy more ammo!
Back to Top
EdwinSm, View Drop Down
Advisor Group
Advisor Group

Joined: April 03 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 4045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote EdwinSm, Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2017 at 10:05pm
You beat me to this.  Another report at

Originally posted by BBC´ BBC´ wrote:

The analysis, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, shows nearly two thirds of cases (61%) were caused by 3% of infected people.

The young and old were more likely to have been "super-spreaders".....

Prof Steven Riley, one of the researchers at Imperial College London, told the BBC News website: "Most cases had a relatively short infectious period and generated low numbers of secondary infections, whereas a small number had longer infectious periods and generated more infections....

Children under 15-years-old and adults over 45 were more likely to be spreading the virus.

"My feeling is this may be explained by human behaviour," said Prof Riley. "It may not even be the cases, but the people around them. I wonder whether it is to do with people coming to care for the young or old."...

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Quick Reply

   NoFollow is applied to all links from this forum
 Enable BBcodes
Security Code:
Code Image - Please contact webmaster if you have problems seeing this image code  Refresh Refresh Image
Please enter the Security Code exactly as shown in image format.
Cookies must be enabled on your web browser.

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down