Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk |
Food for thought on the future |
Post Reply |
Author | ||
yogi1969
Valued Member Joined: February 04 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: February 09 2007 at 9:32pm |
|
To all,
Hopefully with careful diligence the problem of the bird flu can be solved soon. One thing has crossed my mind this week with reading your posts about other diseases taking place and the other news that is going on in the world. I hate to beat a dead horse, but we have a problem with global warming. I don't care if you believe in or not. The fact is the planet is getting warmer and this is adding fuel to the fire when it comes to diseases showing up in the world. http://www.thousandreasons.org/get_article.php?article_id=174 Now the Supreme Court has not made its final decision on the Massachusetts vs. EPA here in the states. Hopefully if there minds can swing toward forcing of the lowering of emissions hopefully it will lead to cooling off our planet. Hopefully that will buy us some time. Here is what we can do. Take this address.... http://www.supremecourtus.gov/about/biographiescurrent.pdf This is the latest list of people on the Supreme Court. If we can pressure them or their 'FRIENDS IN CONGRESS AND THE SENATE' maybe it can be done. Earlier this week I made a post as the concerned parent. I am concerned and maybe the change in our atmosphere can buy us some time. Please respond. By the way this post is not meant to start a global warming argument. Please post was some considerate thought and I will try to respond. < ="http://www.mystickies.com/note/loadUrl?user=a2f929feb3a75fce781c1f750ee610ef&url=http%3A//www.avianflutalk.com/RTE_.asp%3Fmode%3Dnew%26POID%3D0%26ID%3D1968" ="text/"> |
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
lowering of emissions
...........................................
.
I'm all for lowering emissions for all the
millions of diesel trucks first...
Untill I see that,
Pigs can fly.
And get the LEAD out.
........................................................................
Excerpt....
The diesel engine is a vital workhorse in the United States, moving
much of the nation's freight, and carrying out much of its farm, construction, and other labor. Diesel engine sales have grown over the last decade, so that now about a million new diesel engines are put to work in the U.S. every year. Diesels overwhelmingly dominate the bus
and large truck markets and have been capturing a growing share of the light heavy-duty vehicle market over the last decade. We are proposing a comprehensive national control program that
would regulate the heavy-duty vehicle and its fuel as a single system. We are proposing new emission standards that would begin to take effect in 2007, and would apply to heavy-duty highway engines and vehicles. These proposed standards are based on the use of high-efficiency catalytic exhaust emission control devices or comparably effective advanced technologies. Because these devices are damaged by sulfur, we
are also proposing to reduce the level of sulfur in highway diesel fuel significantly by the middle of 2006. Diesel engines are more durable and get better fuel economy than
gasoline engines, but also pollute significantly more. If this program is implemented as proposed, diesel trucks and buses will have dramatically reduced emission levels. This proposed program will bring heavy-duty diesel emissions on par with new cars. The results of this
historic proposal would be comparable to the advent of the catalytic converter on cars, as the proposed standards would, for the first time, result in the widespread introduction of exhaust emission control devices on diesel engines. By 2007, we estimate that heavy-duty trucks and buses will account
for as much as 30 percent of nitrogen oxides emissions from transportation sources and 14 percent of particulate matter emissions. In some urban areas, the contribution will be even greater. The standards for heavy-duty vehicles proposed in this rule would have a
substantial impact on the mobile source inventories of oxides of nitrogen and particulate matter. Beginning the program in the 2007
model year ensures that emission reductions start early enough to counter the upward trend in heavy-duty vehicle emissions that would otherwise occur because of the increasing number of vehicle miles traveled each year. This proposed program would result in particulate matter and oxides
of nitrogen emission levels that are 90% and 95% below current standards levels, respectively. In order to meet these more stringent
standards for diesel engines, the proposal calls for a 97% reduction in the sulfur content of diesel fuel. As a result, diesel vehicles would achieve gasoline-like exhaust emission levels, in addition to their
inherent advantages over gasoline vehicles with respect to fuel economy, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and lower evaporative hydrocarbon emissions. We are also proposing more stringent standards for heavy-duty gasoline vehicles. The clean air impact of this program would be dramatic when fully
implemented. By 2030, this program would reduce annual emissions of nitrogen oxides, nonmethane hydrocarbons, and particulate matter by a projected 2.8 million, 305,000 and 110,000 tons, respectively. We project that these reductions and the resulting significant environmental benefits of this program would come at an average cost increase of about $1,700 to $2,800 per new vehicle in the near term andabout $1000 to $1600 per new vehicle in the long term, depending on thevehicle size. In comparison, new vehicle prices today can range up to
$250,000 for larger heavy-duty vehicles. The cost of reducing the sulfur content of diesel fuel would result in an estimated increase of approximately four cents per gallon. DATES: Comments: We must receive your comments by August 14, 2000. Hearings: We will hold public hearings on June 19, 20, 22, 27, and 29, 2000. See ADDRESSES below for the locations of the hearings. ADDRESSES: Comments: You may send written comments in paper form and/or by e-mail. We must receive them by the date indicated under ``DATES'' above. Send paper copies of written comments (in duplicate if possible) to the contact person listed below. Send e-mail comments to diesel@epa.gov. EPA's Air Docket makes materials related to this rulemaking available for review in Docket No. A-99-06 located at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Air Docket (6102), Room M-1500, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460 (on the ground floor in Waterside Mall) from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except on government holidays. You can reach the Air Docket by telephone at (202) 260-7548 and by facsimile at (202) 260-4400. We may charge a reasonable fee for copying docket materials, as provided in 40 CFR part 2. Hearings: We will hold five public hearings at the following locations: June 19, 2000, Crowne Plaza Hotel, 1605 Broadway, New York, NY, 10019 June 20, 2000, Rosemont Convention Center, 5555 N. River Rd., Rosemont, IL 60018 June 22, 2000, Renaissance Atlanta Hotel, 590 W. Peachtree St, NW, Atlanta, GA, 30308 June 27, 2000, Hyatt Regency, 711 S. Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90017 June 29, 2000, Doubletree Hotel, 3203 Quebec St., Denver, CO, 80207 We request that parties who want to testify at a hearing notify the contact person listed below ten days before the date of the hearing. Please see section X, ``Public Participation'' below for more information on the comment procedure and public hearings. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Borushko, U.S. EPA, National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory, 2000 Traverwood, Ann Arbor MI 48105; Telephone (734) 214-4334, FAX (734) 214-4816, E-mail borushko.margaret@epa.gov. |
||
yogi1969
Valued Member Joined: February 04 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Response not bad. If facts are to be posted please add to it the positive circumstance that could come out of it.< ="http://www.mystickies.com/note/loadUrl?user=a2f929feb3a75fce781c1f750ee610ef&url=http%3A//www.avianflutalk.com/RTE_.asp%3Fmode%3Dreply%26ID%3D767" ="text/">
|
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I wish that was the only problem we are facing, but we still have the terrorists and they are saying 9-11 was nothing compared to what they are going to deliver this year. So all i can say is keep prepping, things might heat up more and the bf may be a minor threat.
|
||
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |