Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > Latest News
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Food for thought on the future
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

Food for thought on the future

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
yogi1969 View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: February 04 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote yogi1969 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Food for thought on the future
    Posted: February 09 2007 at 9:32pm
To all,

Hopefully with careful diligence the problem of the bird flu can be solved soon.  One thing has crossed my mind this week with reading your posts about other diseases taking place and the other news that is going on in the world.

I hate to beat a dead horse, but we have a problem with global warming.  I don't care if you believe in or not.  The fact is the planet is getting warmer and this is adding fuel to the fire when it comes to diseases showing up in the world.

http://www.thousandreasons.org/get_article.php?article_id=174



Now the Supreme Court has not made its final decision on the Massachusetts vs. EPA here in the states.  Hopefully if there minds can swing toward forcing of the lowering of emissions hopefully it will lead to cooling off our planet.  Hopefully that will buy us some time.

Here is what we can do.  Take this address....

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/about/biographiescurrent.pdf

This is the latest list of people on the Supreme Court.  If we can pressure them or their 'FRIENDS IN CONGRESS AND THE SENATE' maybe it can be done. 

Earlier this week I made a post as the concerned parent.  I am concerned and maybe the change in our atmosphere can buy us some time.

Please respond.  By the way this post is not meant to start a global warming argument.  Please post was some considerate thought and I will try to respond.
< ="http://www.mystickies.com/note/loadUrl?user=a2f929feb3a75fce781c1f750ee610ef&url=http%3A//www.avianflutalk.com/RTE_.asp%3Fmode%3Dnew%26POID%3D0%26ID%3D1968" ="text/">
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2007 at 9:48pm
 
lowering of emissions
...........................................
.
I'm all for lowering emissions for all the
 
millions of diesel trucks first...
 
Untill I see that,
 
Pigs can fly.
 
 
And get the LEAD out.
 
 
........................................................................
 
 

Control of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles: Proposed Heavy- Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards and Highway Diesel Fuel Sulfur Control Requirements

 
 
Excerpt....
 
The diesel engine is a vital workhorse in the United States, moving
much of the nation's freight, and carrying out much of its farm,
construction, and other labor. Diesel engine sales have grown over the
last decade, so that now about a million new diesel engines are put to
work in the U.S. every year.
 
Diesels overwhelmingly dominate the bus
and large truck markets and have been capturing a growing share of the
light heavy-duty vehicle market over the last decade.
   
 
We are proposing a comprehensive national control program that
would regulate the heavy-duty vehicle and its fuel as a single system.
We are proposing new emission standards that would begin to take effect
in 2007, and would apply to heavy-duty highway engines and vehicles.
These proposed standards are based on the use of high-efficiency
catalytic exhaust emission control devices or comparably effective
advanced technologies.
 
Because these devices are damaged by sulfur, we
are also proposing to reduce the level of sulfur in highway diesel fuel
significantly by the middle of 2006.
   
 
Diesel engines are more durable and get better fuel economy than
gasoline engines, but also pollute significantly more. If this program
is implemented as proposed, diesel trucks and buses will have
dramatically reduced emission levels. This proposed program will bring
heavy-duty diesel emissions on par with new cars.
 
The results of this
historic proposal would be comparable to the advent of the catalytic
converter on cars, as the proposed standards would, for the first time,
result in the widespread introduction of exhaust emission control
devices on diesel engines.

   
By 2007, we estimate that heavy-duty trucks and buses will account
for as much as 30 percent of nitrogen oxides emissions from
transportation sources and 14 percent of particulate matter emissions.
In some urban areas, the contribution will be even greater.
 
 
The standards for heavy-duty vehicles proposed in this rule would have a
substantial impact on the mobile source inventories of oxides of
nitrogen and particulate matter.
 
Beginning the program in the 2007
model year ensures that emission reductions start early enough to
counter the upward trend in heavy-duty vehicle emissions that would
otherwise occur because of the increasing number of vehicle miles
traveled each year.

   
This proposed program would result in particulate matter and oxides
of nitrogen emission levels that are 90% and 95% below current
standards levels, respectively.
 
In order to meet these more stringent
standards for diesel engines, the proposal calls for a 97% reduction in
the sulfur content of diesel fuel. As a result, diesel vehicles would
achieve gasoline-like exhaust emission levels,
 
 in addition to their
inherent advantages over gasoline vehicles with respect to fuel
economy, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and lower evaporative
hydrocarbon emissions. We are also proposing more stringent standards
for heavy-duty gasoline vehicles.
   
The clean air impact of this program would be dramatic when fully
implemented. By 2030, this program would reduce annual emissions of
nitrogen oxides, nonmethane hydrocarbons, and particulate matter by a
projected 2.8 million, 305,000 and 110,000 tons, respectively. We
project that these reductions and the resulting significant
environmental benefits of this program would come at an average cost
increase of about $1,700 to $2,800 per new vehicle in the near term andabout $1000 to $1600 per new vehicle in the long term, depending on thevehicle size.
 
In comparison, new vehicle prices today can range up to
$250,000 for larger heavy-duty vehicles. The cost of reducing the
sulfur content of diesel fuel would result in an estimated increase of
approximately four cents per gallon.

DATES: Comments: We must receive your comments by August 14, 2000.
    Hearings: We will hold public hearings on June 19, 20, 22, 27, and
29, 2000. See ADDRESSES below for the locations of the hearings.

ADDRESSES: Comments: You may send written comments in paper form and/or
by e-mail. We must receive them by the date indicated under ``DATES''
above. Send paper copies of written comments (in duplicate if possible)
to the contact person listed below. Send e-mail comments to
diesel@epa.gov.
    EPA's Air Docket makes materials related to this rulemaking
available for review in Docket No. A-99-06 located at U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Air Docket (6102), Room M-1500,
401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460 (on the ground floor in
Waterside Mall) from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
on government holidays. You can reach the Air Docket by telephone at
(202) 260-7548 and by facsimile at (202) 260-4400. We may charge a
reasonable fee for copying docket materials, as provided in 40 CFR part
2.
    Hearings: We will hold five public hearings at the following
locations:

    June 19, 2000, Crowne Plaza Hotel, 1605 Broadway, New York, NY,
10019
    June 20, 2000, Rosemont Convention Center, 5555 N. River Rd.,
Rosemont, IL 60018
    June 22, 2000, Renaissance Atlanta Hotel, 590 W. Peachtree St, NW,
Atlanta, GA, 30308
    June 27, 2000, Hyatt Regency, 711 S. Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA,
90017
    June 29, 2000, Doubletree Hotel, 3203 Quebec St., Denver, CO, 80207

    We request that parties who want to testify at a hearing notify the
contact person listed below ten days before the date of the hearing.
Please see section X, ``Public Participation'' below for more
information on the comment procedure and public hearings.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Borushko, U.S. EPA, National
Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory, 2000 Traverwood, Ann Arbor MI
48105; Telephone (734) 214-4334, FAX (734) 214-4816, E-mail
borushko.margaret@epa.gov.

Back to Top
yogi1969 View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: February 04 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote yogi1969 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2007 at 9:55pm
Response  not  bad.   If  facts  are to be  posted  please  add  to  it  the positive  circumstance  that  could come  out of  it.< ="http://www.mystickies.com/note/loadUrl?user=a2f929feb3a75fce781c1f750ee610ef&url=http%3A//www.avianflutalk.com/RTE_.asp%3Fmode%3Dreply%26ID%3D767" ="text/">
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2007 at 9:56pm
I wish that was the only problem we are facing, but we still have the terrorists and they are saying 9-11 was nothing compared to what they are going to deliver this year.    So all i can say is keep prepping, things might heat up more and the bf may be a minor threat.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down