Has a Population Protocol Control been Activated?

Did I mention a pandemic?

Why are you such an ass?  Does it come naturally to you, are were you born an ass?  Either way...it is tiresome.  You cannot go around telling strangers (and probably what friends you have) that their ideas are "stupid", as you are indirectly calling them stupid as well.  You should look up the definitions of both "stupid" and "ignorant"...and use the words in their correct sense if you feel the need to disagree with someone's comments or views.

As Albert would say! DING ,DING, 

LOL I am *NOT* a pothead, but bust their dealers on a regular basis.

Speaking of the Watermelons and their hatred of life and their thought enemies: This from the Climate Depot website.

Strangle Skeptics in Bed! Romm's Climate Progress features threat to skeptics! 'An entire generation will soon be ready to strangle you and your kind while you sleep in your beds'
Friday, June 05, 2009By Marc Morano – Climate Depot
A comment on Joe Romm's Climate Progress blog threatens physical harm to those skeptical of man-made climate fears. The June 5, 2009 comment, posted at 3:01 PM, under the name "Creative Greenius" warns any dissenters from man-made global warming fears that "an entire generation that will soon be ready to strangle you and your kind while you sleep in your beds." A man named Joe Galliani appears to be the man behind the comments and the Creative Greenius website.

Romm, a former Clinton Administration official, touts New York Times Columnist Tom Friedman praising Climate Progress as an "indispensable blog.” Romm was also named by U.S. News and World Report as one of the "top 8 Washington players on energy and the environment" and dubbed an "Influential Liberal Climate Change Expert" by the magazine. Romm also debated Climate Depot's Executive Editor Marc Morano on Roll Call TV about global warming and energy policy. ( See: Morano debates former Clinton Official Romm - April 6, 2009 )

This latest threat made against skeptics comes just days after the influential website Talking Points Memo prominently featured a public call "to jail or execute global warming deniers."

The full post of the Climate Progress comment is reproduced below. Climate Depot has also captured a screen shot of the comments in case they rapidly disappear like the Talking Point Memo article.

Climate Progress threatening comment reproduced in full:

Creative Greenius Says:

June 5th, 2009 at 3:01 pm
@hunter It's always amusing when some anonymous troll with no website link talks tough in someone else's blog comments.

But when you've got absolutely nothing going for you, lie about everything, and are always wrong, that's a good choice for you to have made.

It is not my wrath you need fear when there's an entire generation that will soon be ready to strangle you and your kind while you sleep in your beds. [End transcript]

#

Below is Climate Depot's exclusive June 3, 2009 report on the sampling of threats and intimidation aimed at climate skeptics.

'Execute' Skeptics! Shock Call To Action: 'At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers' -- 'Shouldn't we start punishing them now?'
Wednesday, June 03, 2009 - By Marc Morano – Climate Depot
A public appeal has been issued by an influential U.S. website asking: “At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers.” The appeal appeared on Talking Points Memo, an often cited website that helps set the agenda for the political Left in the U.S. The anonymous posting, dated June 2, 2009, referred to dissenters of man-made global warming fears as “greedy bastards” who use “bogus science or the lowest scientists in the gene pool” to “distort data."
The Talking Points Memo article continues: “So when the right wing BLEEPtards have caused it to be too late to fix the problem, and we start seeing the devastating consequences and we start seeing end of the World type events - how will we punish those responsible. It will be too late. So shouldn't we start punishing them now?"
The article also claims the “vast majority” of scientists agree that man-made warming “can do an untold amount of damage to life on Earth.”

The full text of the Talking Points Memo is reproduced below:

(Note: The entry is posted under the anonymous byline "The Insolent Braggart")

At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers

June 2, 2009, 9:42PM

What is so frustrating about these fools is that they are the politicians and greedy bastards who don't want a cut in their profits who use bogus science or the lowest scientists in the gene pool who will distort data for a few bucks. The vast majority of the scientific minds in the World agree and understand it's a very serious problem that can do an untold amount of damage to life on Earth.

So when the right wing BLEEPtards have caused it to be too late to fix the problem, and we start seeing the devastating consequences and we start seeing end of the World type events - how will we punish those responsible. It will be too late. So shouldn't we start punishing them now?

#

Climate Depot Editor's Note:

The Talking Points Memo appeal to execute skeptics is not unique. As the science behind man-made global warming fears utterly collapses, many of the biggest promoters of the theory and environmental activists are growing increasingly desperate. Looming Question: If the promoters of man-made climate fears truly believed the "debate is over" and the science is "settled", why is there such a strong impulse to shut down debate and threaten those who disagree?

Small sampling of threats, intimidation and censorship:

NASA's James Hansen has called for trials of climate skeptics in 2008 for "high crimes against humanity.” Environmentalist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. lashed out at skeptics of 2007 declaring “This is treason. And we need to start treating them as traitors” In 2009, RFK, Jr. also called coal companies "criminal enterprises" and declared CEO's 'should be in jail... for all of eternity."

In 2006, the eco-magazine Grist called for Nuremberg-Style trials for skeptics. In 2008, Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki called for government leaders skeptical of global warming to be thrown “into jail.” In 2007, The Weather Channel's climate expert called for withholding certification of skeptical meteorologists.

A 2008 report found that 'climate blasphemy' is replacing traditional religious blasphemy. In addition, a July 2007 Senate report detailed how skeptical scientists have faced threats and intimidation.

In 2007, then EPA Chief Vowed to Probe E-mail Threatening to 'Destroy' Career of Climate Skeptic and dissenters of warming fears have been called 'Climate Criminals' who are committing 'Terracide' (killing of Planet Earth) (July 25, 2007) In addition, in May 2009, Climate Depot Was Banned in Louisiana! See: State official sought to 'shut down' climate skeptic's testimony at hearing.

Below are many more examples of the threats, name calling and intimidation skeptics have faced in recent times.

November 12, 2007: UN official warns ignoring warming would be 'criminally irresponsible' Excerpt: The U.N.'s top climate official warned policymakers and scientists trying to hammer out a landmark report on climate change that ignoring the urgency of global warming would be "criminally irresponsible." Yvo de Boer's comments came at the opening of a weeklong conference that will complete a concise guide on the state of global warming and what can be done to stop the Earth from overheating.

September 29. 2007: VA State Climatologist skeptical of global warming loses job after clash with Governor: 'I was told that I could not speak in public' Excerpt: Michaels has argued that the climate is becoming warmer but that the consequences will not be as dire as others have predicted. Gov. Kaine had warned. Michaels not to use his official title in discussing his views. "I resigned as Virginia state climatologist because I was told that I could not speak in public on my area of expertise, global warming, as state climatologist," Michaels said in a statement this week provided by the libertarian Cato Institute, where he has been a fellow since 1992. "It was impossible to maintain academic freedom with this speech restriction." (LINK)

Skeptical State Climatologist in Oregon has title threatened by Governor (February 8, 2007) Excerpt: “[State Climatologist George Taylor] does not believe human activities are the main cause of global climate change...So the [Oregon] governor wants to take that title from Taylor and make it a position that he would appoint. In an exclusive interview with KGW-TV, Governor Ted Kulongoski confirmed he wants to take that title from Taylor.

Skeptical State Climatologist in Delaware silenced by Governor (May 2, 2007) Excerpt: Legates is a state climatologist in Delaware, and he teaches at the university. He`s not part of the mythical climate consensus. In fact, Legates believes that we oversimplify climate by just blaming greenhouse gases. One day he received a letter from the governor, saying his views do not concur with those of the administration, so if he wants to speak out, it must be as an individual, not as a state climatologist. So essentially, you can have the title of state climatologist unless he`s talking about his views on climate?

October 28, 2008: License to dissent: 'Internet should be nationalized as a public utility' to combat global warming skepticism - Australian Herald Sun - Excerpt: British journalism lecturer and warming alarmist Alex Lockwood says my blog is a menace to the planet. Skeptical bloggers like me need bringing into line, and Lockwood tells a journalism seminar of some options: There is clearly a need for research into the ways in which climate skepticism online is free to contest scientific fact. But there is enough here already to put forward some of the ideas in circulation. One of the founders of the Internet Vint Cerf, and lead for Google's Internet for Everyone project, made a recent suggestion that the Internet should be nationalized as a public utility. As tech policy blogger Jim Harper argues, “giving power over the Internet to well-heeled interests and self-interested politicians” is, and I quote, “a bad idea.” Or in the UK every new online publication could be required to register with the recently announced Internet watchdog...

November 5, 2008: UK Scientist: 'BBC SHUNNED ME FOR DENYING CLIMATE CHANGE' – UK Daily Express

Excerpt: FOR YEARS David Bellamy was one of the best known faces on TV. A respected botanist and the author of 35 books, he had presented around 400 programmes over the years and was appreciated by audiences for his boundless enthusiasm. Yet for more than 10 years he has been out of the limelight, shunned by bosses at the BBC where he made his name, as well as fellow scientists and environmentalists. His crime? Bellamy says he doesn't believe in man-made global warming. Here he reveals why – and the price he has paid for not toeing the orthodox line on climate change.

U.N. official says it's 'completely immoral' to doubt global warming fears (May 10, 2007)

Excerpt: UN special climate envoy Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland declared “it's completely immoral, even, to question” the UN's scientific “consensus."

Former US Vice President Al Gore compared global warming skeptics to people who 'believe the moon landing was actually staged in a movie lot in Arizona' (June 20, 2006)

Gore Refuses to Hear Skeptical Global Warming Views (Video)

UK environment secretary David Miliband said 'those who deny [climate change] are the flat-Earthers of the twenty-first century' (October 6, 2006)

Weather Channel Climate Expert Calls for Decertifying Global Warming Skeptics (January 17, 2007) Excerpt: The Weather Channel's most prominent climatologist is advocating that broadcast meteorologists be stripped of their scientific certification if they express skepticism about predictions of manmade catastrophic global warming. This latest call to silence skeptics follows a year (2006) in which skeptics were compared to "Holocaust Deniers" and Nuremberg-style war crimes trials were advocated by several climate alarmists.

Related Links:

Skeptic Responds: 'Bring it on...yer nothin but a bunch of Ivory Tower Cowards!'

'Hate sport': 'Simply lone fanatic?'

Global warmists' 'worse than the vigilante actions of the Freemans...and have following bigger than Jim Jones!'

'Is it worth taking another's life?'

Democrats Refuse to Allow Skeptic to Testify Alongside Gore At Congressional Hearing - April 23, 2009


S. African UN Scientist: 'The whole climate change issue is about to fall apart -- Heads will roll!' - April 2009

Climate Depot Editorial: We would all be doomed if we actually faced climate 'crisis' - Cap-and-trade equals all economic pain for no climate gain

Warming theory 'dying the death of a thousand cuts' - Ocean Conveyor Belt Model Broken: 'Models are significantly wrong' - May 2009

Climate Fears RIP...for 30 years!? - Global Warming could stop 'for up to 30 years! Warming 'On Hold?...'Could go into hiding for decades' study finds – Discovery.com – March 2, 2009

Japanese Scientist compares global warming to 'astrology'

U.S. Senate Report: 700 Plus Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Warming Claims

Turboguy: Please forgive those who suffer anger and drug induced insanity; those who rabidly insult and threaten normal people, for they know no better from their cave in the sticks.

It would be a blessing if such troubled individuals would stay off the thread which is discussing the elite's willingness to kill Americans which includes him and the ones he loves.

Thanks for your service and God bless.

I agree with Technologist. Inthesticks the last post you made at TurboGuy went too far. In reality it is a death threat to TurboGuy, our Military and our Civil Servant Officers. I agree you may or may not have meant this to be as serious a threat, but you should be reprimanded by AFT and should not be encouraged to spout such wording. I know this is not what Avian Flu Talk would want posted publically by a news reporter and this is not what AFT is about.

Annie wrote: I agree with Technologist. Inthesticks the last post you made at TurboGuy went too far. In reality it is a death threat to TurboGuy, our Military and our Civil Servant Officers. I agree you may or may not have meant this to be as serious a threat, but you should be reprimanded by AFT and should not be encouraged to spout such wording. I know this is not what Avian Flu Talk would want posted publically by a news reporter and this is not what AFT is about.

Annie wrote: I agree with Technologist. Inthesticks the last post you made at TurboGuy went too far. In reality it is a death threat to TurboGuy, our Military and our Civil Servant Officers. I agree you may or may not have meant this to be as serious a threat, but you should be reprimanded by AFT and should not be encouraged to spout such wording. I know this is not what Avian Flu Talk would want posted publically by a news reporter and this is not what AFT is about.

sorry it took so long to get back to this thread, my computer power source box died and it took a few days to get it repaired.

Well, this thread has been quite a "read". The one thing that stands out to me was the history of infectious disease experiments. If even half of that stuff is true, we've really got a problem on our hands. How is it that this information is not more readily available? Blackout? We are already suspecting that with respect to SF. It's next to impossible to now get any information of actual cases from our state DOH. They discontinued publishing totals May 26 (see SF Washington State). So if you ask me if infection rates can be kept from the people, I sure see it locally.

Having said all that, I mention that smoking weed dilates the aereols (sp) of the lung tissue and allows for freer breathing. Good for asthema, COPD breathing type conditions. D

Another addition to the pharmalogical chronology earlier in this thread. D

Swine flu 'could be man-made'
2009-04-28 11:32

Jakarta - Indonesian Health Minister Siti Fadilah Supari said Tuesday the deadly swine flu virus could have been man-made, as she urged calm over its spread around the world.

The controversial minister did not elaborate but in the past she has said Western governments could be making and spreading viruses in the developing world to boost pharmaceutical companies' profits.

"I'm not sure whether the virus was genetically engineered but it's a possibility," she told reporters at a press conference called to reassure the public over the government's response to the swine flu threat.

No cases of the disease have been reported in Indonesia, the country worst hit by the bird flu virus which has killed about 250 people worldwide since 2003.

Indonesian authorities have increased body temperature scanners at airports and banned imports of live pigs and pork products, amid World Health Organisation (WHO) warnings of a pandemic.

Supari, a cardiologist, also claimed that the H1N1 strain of swine flu, which is believed to have killed more than 150 people in Mexico, could not survive in tropical countries like Indonesia.

"We have to be alert at all times although swine flu in Indonesia is not a cause for panic," she said.

"H1N1 survives in countries with four seasons. The type A H1N1 virus hopefully won't be able to sustain itself once it enters the tropical climate of Indonesia," she added.

The virus has been found in 11 countries including Mexico, the United States and Spain, while several other countries from Colombia to New Zealand are investigating suspected cases.

Supari said the health ministry had prepared 100 hospitals to handle swine flu cases should the disease enter Indonesia.

The minister has refused since 2006 to share all but a handful of Indonesia's bird flu virus samples with WHO researchers, saying the system is being abused by rich countries to develop profitable vaccines which poor countries must buy.

- AFP

Turboguy wrote: Tenth Door, Sticks is a jackass and the only one to make crude remarks in this thread.

That's your opinion and some of the commenters that followed and supported you are scarier to me than Legalized Drugs.  I've written down the names so I don't read any of their threads or comment back to them either.  Why?  I consider their responses ignorant, sorry.  We've been lied to over and over again by those in "the Know", what the heck makes this war on the people any different?  (don't answer that, it's a rhetorical question, just think about it).   

Sara123 - do you more info on that story? I think I did hear about it. Could be why I'm a little skeptical about things right now. Let us know if you can find the link. Many thanx, D

I am wondering what folks think about the elite's effort to hide transmission, hospitalization, and death data of the Swine flu from the public in order to "not cause panic."

In reality hiding data serves those in control. Keeping the public in teh dark forgoes demands from the public for survival. The elite have expressed the desire through the UN to reduce the population of their globe by half; and ofcourse, they are very worried about their economy or investments.

Ban mahshadin! He/she/it is conspiring with a refusnik in opposition to dear leader's nationalization of health care!

Penham wrote: Sara123 wrote: Ban mahshadin! He/she/it is conspiring with a refusnik in opposition to dear leader's nationalization of health care!   People do not get banned here for expressing their views in a rational manner about the topic being discussed. Just because they do not agree with your opinion does not mean they need to be banned. People can get banned for targeting other members and name calling. Everyone needs to stay on topic and carry on in a rational manner. Thank you!

Very good point! Hear that mahshadin? You are in the US now.