Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > General Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Does Radiation Exposure reduce the risk of Cancer?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

Does Radiation Exposure reduce the risk of Cancer?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Technologist View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: May 05 2009
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 1192
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Technologist Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Does Radiation Exposure reduce the risk of Cancer?
    Posted: August 30 2009 at 10:12pm
Here's another bizarre item that at first you will think I'm wrong about. I don't mind being wrong as I'll learn something new if I am.

Increasing your exposure to radiation seems to lower your risk of getting cancer dramatically.

It seems that areas in the united states with the highest background gamma radiation and radon also have the lowest cases of cancer per populous. We have Genes that get activated when exposed to radiation that fight off cancer. I could be wrong but I've found a good deal of evidence that this is true.

I'm guessing that over millions of years our bodies have adapted to varying levels of radiation and learned to fight cancer when radiation increases. I'm not talking about massive exposures that will trigger cancer but levels 3-100 times normal background levels.

Here is one of many typical Cancer risk maps covering the United States.


Here is a Gamma radiation map of the United States.


Here is a Radon map of the United States.


Note the Higher the Radon and Gamma Radiation the LOWER the Cancer Rates. Some places have 10 times the Cancer risk yet 1/4th the Gamma radiation and 1/3 the Radon. Also note Pilots are exposed to 20 times normal radiation and have no increased risk of cancer. I have a bunch of other data but this should give you something to think about.
Back to Top
Mary008 View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 5769
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mary008 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 30 2009 at 10:22pm
 
 
 
I'm not amazed to see that area of VA beat red... they fog (spray) every week for about 4
 
months to keep down the mosquitos.  Can't be good for the lungs...and you can be driving
 
along and see all kinds of crop spraying going on.  The sun reacts with polution..auto/truck
 
exhaust etc. to make it look pretty hazy there all summer.
Back to Top
Dr.Who View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group


Joined: January 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 392
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dr.Who Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2009 at 6:06am
An interesting theory. I would want to see a study that compared the rates from two  counties that were similar in other ways - otherwise we might end up just comparing South-East to North-West.
Back to Top
Technologist View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: May 05 2009
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 1192
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Technologist Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2009 at 6:49am
I can dig up a bunch of older stories that suggest that what I'm postulating might be true. I just don't have time to do it now. Some demonstrate that (highly radioactive) mammals exposed to massive long term radiation. About 100 times the radiation of the bombs dropped on Japan, are in healthy condition.

Here is one of them:

Quote: Chernobyl Animals Highly Contaminated But Undeformed

ScienceDaily (Sep. 16, 1997) When University of Georgia researchers hold a Geiger counter over rodents living near the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in the Ukraine, the clicks grow quickly into a continuous roar.
"You wouldn't want to handle an animal like that, and yet they are surviving," said Cham E. Dallas, a UGA associate professor of pharmacology and toxicology, who - with fellow researchers - has made eight expeditions to Chernobyl since 1991.

-Snip-

Quote:
Rodents such as voles show even higher levels of contamination, as much as 10 times the levels found in U.S. rodents. "No one has ever seen levels like that before," Dallas said. UGA researchers also have found genetic changes in these animals.
"I use the word change and not damage," Dallas said, because the implications of the changes remain unclear. "We found no deformed animals. None at all."

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1997/09/970916055418.htm

My other off the wall theory. Radiation is everywhere and we are constantly bombarded with it and have been for all eternity. What if radiation is what controls genetic mutations and adaptation or put another way. Mutations or RADIATION are the raw materials of evolution?

Back to Top
Mary008 View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 5769
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mary008 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2009 at 8:14am

Much of the area of blue and pink is way less populated than areas of red (lung cancer)

Red,( lung cancer)  in  the Sun Belt (sunlight reaction with pollution) and the east coast area is highly populated...especially with elderly...so there are a lot of other exlpanations/factors to explain the incidence of lung cancer in areas of red.

 
...................
 
 
 
Back to Top
Technologist View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: May 05 2009
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 1192
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Technologist Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2009 at 10:48am
Originally posted by Mary008 Mary008 wrote:

Much of the area of blue and pink is way less populated than areas of red (lung cancer)


Red,( lung cancer)  in the Sun Belt (sunlight reaction with pollution) and the east coast area is highly populated...especially with elderly...so there are a lot of other exlpanations/factors to explain the incidence of lung cancer in areas of red.


 




I'm sure there are endless other reasons for cancer like pollution, income, ethnicity, chemicals in the food, ground and water. The list never ends but I just don't see how you're reading the map. The top map is Cancers per 100,000 People based on each county in the US so it's balanced. New Jersey has the highest population density state in the United States and it's not red, same with very high density areas in California and New York are not red so I don't see your correlation.

You can look at other Cancer maps that cover just about every type of cancer and see whey match Radon, Gamma rates like this one does.
Back to Top
Technologist View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: May 05 2009
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 1192
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Technologist Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2009 at 11:14am
Massive amounts of radiation over a short period of time has been proven to cause cancer. Then again It was once believed that drinking radioactive water cured all kinds of ailments. We call it quackery now but it is possible that long term exposure to radiation triggers our genes to fight cancer.

Here is a link of people drinking radioactive water in the 1920's http://www.museumofquackery.com/devices/radium.htm

I'm not suggesting anyone expose themselves to radiation. I'm just suggesting that natural cures for cancer might come in opposite ways of traditional thinking. Long term exposure to something we though was harmful "might" actually be helpful.

Remember that Radiation is also natural and has been around for billions of years. Salt is a necessity of life. To little and we die, to much and we die. Radiation levels might also have a balance point to reduce cancer.

Back to Top
Mary008 View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 5769
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mary008 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2009 at 6:16pm

.

It seems that areas in the united states with the
 
highest background gamma radiation and radon
 
also have the lowest cases of cancer per populous.
..................

I was thinking that those areas mentioned,
 
gamma radiation (pink) and radon (pink again)
 
are for the most part...not highly populated  
 
and not highly polluted + SUN

2 large contributing factors to higher  L.C. numbers

also factors

Cheaper ciggs (tobacco states in red area) more smoking

North Carolina and Kentucky account for approximately 65 percent of total U.S.
production, and four other states (Tennessee, Virginia, South Carolina, and Georgia)
produce approximately 25 percent of all U.S. tobacco.

lower income
 
less education (especially about smoking danger)
 
stress
.........................................................................................
 
 thoughts ... to join in the discussion.
 
 
Back to Top
Medclinician View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member
Avatar
Valued Member Since 2006

Joined: July 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 23322
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Medclinician Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2009 at 6:42pm
I simply could not resist this Tech. My father, in the Navy was there at Bikini Island or whatever when they tested the A-Bomb. Later in life he developed prostate cancer, and they also gave him huge doses of radiation. He was able to tolerate the radiation more and it killed the cancer. He lived for another 25 years. He did get the Cancer- but he was able to fight it off. Working in X-Ray and with my radiation oblivious doctors I have had enough CAT scans and other high radiation procedures I should glow in the dark. No one has ever done a Rad check on me to check. Thank God for MRI.

Now scientifically, it should do the opposite. It would suppress the immune system, and make you more susceptible.

So far I don't even have benign prostrate hypertrophy. Maybe there is something to what you are saying.

Med
Back to Top
Medclinician View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member
Avatar
Valued Member Since 2006

Joined: July 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 23322
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Medclinician Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2009 at 6:46pm
Originally posted by Mary008 Mary008 wrote:

.

It seems that areas in the united states with the
 
highest background gamma radiation and radon
 
also have the lowest cases of cancer per populous.
..................


You haven't been to West Virginia. I had 5 radon tests kits sent to me by EPA and we were getting some real high stuff here near a possible fissure. WV is notorious for Radon gas and we have some of the highest cancer rates in the U.S.

Radon gas isn't doing us any favors here.

Med
Back to Top
Mary008 View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 5769
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mary008 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2009 at 6:50pm
 
 
....notice the red...L.C. in W. Virginia... included in my posts :)  
 
 ( you are quoting Tech. silly )
Back to Top
abcdefg View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: September 19 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 578
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote abcdefg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2009 at 10:59pm
Medicine does use radiation to burn cancer out. As we know. Also they use it with goiters in Graves Disease, my mother had a toxic goiter and had to use radio active iodine per the Mayo Clinic in the sixties. 
 
When they give this treatment now, they are all dressed in Haz Mat suits when they give the patient the radio active iodine. It is put through a hole in a door of a special room that the patient is expected to reside in during treatment. In my Moms day in the sixties she was handed it to drink with a tongs, she drank it and returned home to us in the family. Now they say it is especially dangerous to children.  My sisters and I were all around her. As was my grandmother and Aunt and Dad, and my Aunt and Dad both got cancer but very late in life. My Mom was fine, and so is everyone else from a cancer standpoint, Praise God so far.
 
I never did understand that that treatment. They still use it.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down