Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk |
H7N9 |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Kay
Adviser Group Joined: October 22 2014 Location: OHIO Status: Offline Points: 7205 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Posted: January 14 2015 at 4:15pm |
http://www.medpagetoday.com/InfectiousDisease/URItheFlu/40037
The novel H7N9 avian flu appears to be less severe than the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian flu but more severe than the 2009 pandemic H1N1 flu, researchers reported. The first estimate of the severity profile of the novel flu suggests that it kills 36% of those who are admitted to a hospital, according to Chinese researchers led by Yu Wang, PhD, of the Chinese equivalent of the CDC in Beijing. That's lower than the 60% observed worldwide with H5N1, but higher than the 21% seen in China with the pandemic H1N1 strain, the researchers reported online in The Lancet. n a separate paper in the journal, the same group of researchers found epidemiological similarities and differences between the two avian influenza strains and warned that -- if they follow similar temporal patterns -- the H7N9 flu could recur this fall. The severity estimates are the best that can be done "in view of the available information," commented Cécile Viboud, PhD, of the NIH in Bethesda, Md., and Lone Simonsen, PhD, of George Washington University in Washington, D.C. But the uncertainty surrounding them means "public health experts will have to make policy decisions on the basis of uncomfortably broad confidence limits" when and if the flu returns, they argued in an accompanying commentary. On the oth other hand, they noted, it is "reassuring" that the data suggest a substantially less severe disease course for the H7N9 flu than has been seen for H5N1. According to the World Health Organization, there have been 630 laboratory-confirmed human cases of H5N1 infection since 2003, of which 375 resulted in death. he agency is also reporting 132 laboratory-confirmed cases of H7N9 flu, including 37 deaths. For their analysis, Wang and colleagues estimated the risk of fatality, mechanical ventilation, and admission to intensive care for the 123 patients who required hospital admission for medical reasons. They used data from sentinel influenza-like illness (ILI) surveillance to develop an estimate of the case-fatality risk among patients who had symptoms, but who may or may not have needed hospital care.
Interestingly, they reported, the fatality risk estimate varied significantly by age (at P=0.0019) -- 18% for those younger than 60 and 49% for those 60 and older.
|
|
jacksdad
Executive Admin Joined: September 08 2007 Location: San Diego Status: Offline Points: 47251 |
Post Options
Thanks(2)
|
Interesting article, but H1N1's CFR seems unrealistically high, even for hospitalized patients. Even if only 10% of China's 1.3 billion population were sickened in 2009, and 1% of those were hospitalized, a 21% CFR would still result in 270,000 deaths - the same as the estimated global death toll for the entire pandemic.
H7N9 definitely has what it takes to spark a major pandemic should it go H2H. It might be running at a much lower CFR than H5N1, but it's infecting humans far more efficiently. A pandemic strain doesn't have to kill in large numbers to bring modern day society to a halt. Sicken a third of the population severely enough and our global "just in time" system will fail. An interesting read - thanks for posting, Kay |
|
"Buy it cheap. Stack it deep"
"Any community that fails to prepare, with the expectation that the federal government will come to the rescue, will be tragically wrong." Michael Leavitt, HHS Secretary. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |