Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese


Forum Home Forum Home > General Discussion > General Discussion > Off Topic Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - If Fossil fuels were gone tommrow...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Online Discussion: Tracking new emerging diseases and the next pandemic

If Fossil fuels were gone tommrow...

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
carbon20 View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: April 08 2006
Location: West Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28381
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote carbon20 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2019 at 4:13pm
It's only the start, if you believe the modeling the planet is in for a rough ride,

One things for sure the planet will still be here, we humans will still be here, but it won't be anything like the life we lead now......

I worry about my grandchildren ,

It will 2070 when the oldest is my age....

I'll be long gone......
12 Monkeys...............
1995 ‧ Science fiction film/Thriller ‧ 2h 11m a must for AFT
Back to Top
Technophobe View Drop Down
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2014
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 56070
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Technophobe Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2019 at 4:31pm
Modeling, hum..............

I did a course in modeling a year or so ago ('hardest one I ever took) and the very first lesson included the phrase: "all models are wrong." The explanation of that was very interesting. All models ARE wrong, but those using no models arrive at conclusions even further from the truth. Those people using several different models and combining the results got closest to predicting the correct outcomes (as high as 95% accruacy sometimes!).

Climate change modellers are each using different models and arriving at similar conclusions. This suggests that they are at least on the right track. What worries me about the mathematics used, is that each model seems to be based on different axioms. Each leaves out sections of known science. (for instance, CO2 models incorporate methane but normally ignore the methane from methane hydrates and the sea level rise calculators do not usually include isostatic readjustment.) This and the fact that most individually use only one model, suggests that the deleterious effects of climate change could be considerably worse than current predictions.

Still, the models keep improving so they may end up accurate soon.
Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Back to Top
DeepThinker View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member
Avatar

Joined: September 26 2015
Location: So. California
Status: Offline
Points: 2275
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DeepThinker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2019 at 7:18pm
I wish there was a way but I would bet good money that in 5 years it will obvious the planet is cooling and not warming.

The Sun is going quiet, so the next couple decades don't look good for warming.   The equinox is progressing so the next few hundred years to the next couple thousand years don't look good either.

Maybe global warming will save us from the Ice Age that is now over due.   I sure hope so but I doubt it.
Back to Top
carbon20 View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: April 08 2006
Location: West Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28381
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote carbon20 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2019 at 9:54pm
Home News Tech Health Planet Earth Strange News Animals History Culture Space & Physics
Live Science is supported by its audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more
Crash! 10 Biggest Impact Craters on Earth
By Becky Oskin 28 April 2014

    

Ancient scars

An artist’s concept of the giant asteroid or comet plunging into what is now Chesapeake Bay 35 million years ago.
(Image: © Science)
Whether they're the size of a molehill or a mountain, meteorite impacts are one of the most destructive forces in the solar system. Here on Earth, flying space debris triggered mass extinctions, but the same deadly asteroids might also have delivered the seeds of life soon after Earth was born. The effects of asteroid impacts linger for billions of years. Here are the 10 biggest impact craters known, from largest to smallest.

Vredefort crater


In the abraded heart of South Africa's Vredefort impact crater lurk striking green-black rocks, some of the only remnants of a magma sea that once filled the gaping crater.
(Image: © NASA)
The oldest impact crater on Earth is also the largest. Vredefort crater in South Africa, also called the Vredefort Dome, was originally 185 miles (300 kilometers) across, scientists estimate. A meteorite or asteroid bigger than South Africa's Table Mountain blasted out the giant crater 2.02 billion years ago.

Sudbury crater
Sudbury crater
(Image: © NASA)
Sudbury crater in Ontario, Canada, clocks in at 81 miles (130 km) wide and 1.85 billion years old, close in age and size to Vredefort crater in South Africa. The original crater is believed to have sprawled 160 miles (260 km). Rock fragments from the impact have been found in Minnesota, over 500 miles (800 km) away.

Chicxulub crater
Chicxulub crater
(Image: © LPI)
Chicxulub crater's discovery clinched what was once a wild theory: that a meteor impact wiped out the dinosaurs. A thin layer of exotic iridium metal from a meteor impact had been detected worldwide at Cretaceous mass extinction before Chicxulub was found. Now, the meteorite that carved the Chicxulub crater in Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula is widely thought to have caused or greatly contributed to the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous 65 million years ago, including the end of the dinosaurs. Some scientists think Chicxulub's original crater may have been bigger than Sudbury crater in Ontario. Estimates of its original diameter range up to 150 miles (240 km) in diameter, and its current size is 93 miles (150 km).

Popigai crater
Popigai crater
(Image: © NASA)
A rare find is buried in Russia's Popigai crater: diamonds. Some 35 million years ago, a meteorite crashed into carbon-rich graphite rock deposits in Siberia, and the impact's immense pressures and temperatures converted the carbon into diamonds. The crater is 62 miles (100 km) wide and holds massive diamond reserves, according to the Russian government.

Manicouagan crater
Manicouagan crater
(Image: © Landsat)
Our first lake-filled crater, Manicouagan in Quebec is one the largest and best-preserved crater on the planet. The 62-mile-wide (100 km) crater is 214 million years old.

Acraman crater
Acraman crater
(Image: © NASA Earth Observatory)
Lake Acraman fills this round impact crater, excavated 580 million years ago in South Australia. The crater measures 56 miles (90 kilometers) in diameter. Impact ejecta from the crater can be found in the Flinders Range 185 miles (300 km) to the east, among rocks with fossils of the first complex life forms on Earth.

Chesapeake Bay crater
Chesapeake Bay crater
(Image: © WHOI/USGS)
Buried under seafloor muds, Chesapeake Bay Crater offshore of Virginia is an estimated 35 million years old. The curving western shoreline of Chesapeake Bay takes its shape from the 53-mile-wide (85 km) marine crater. A drilling core revealed the first hints that a large impact crater was buried beneath the bay in 1983, when the core brought up an 8-inch-thick (20 centimeters) layer of impact ejecta.

Morokweng crater
Morokweng meteorite
(Image: © J.Hills/Science Museum London)
Morokweng Crater is buried beneath South Africa's Kalahari Desert: Geologists discovered it through remote sensing surveys. But scientists got a surprise when they drilled into the crater looking for rock samples to confirm the impact. The remains of the meteorite that created this crater were still in its depth. The drill brought back a 10-inch (25 centimeter) fragment of the original meteorite from about 842 yards (770 meters) below the surface. Morokweng formed 145 million years ago and is 44 miles (70 km) wide.

Kara crater
Kara crater
(Image: © NASA Earth Observatory.)
Kara crater is a 70.3-million-year-old eroded crater exposed in Russia's Yugorsky Peninsula. Researchers think the 40-mile-wide (65 km) crater was once more than 75 miles (120 km) in diameter.

Beaverhead crater
Beaverhead crater
(Image: © USDA)
This 600-million-year-old crater spans Montana and Idaho and is the second-largest impact crater in the United States. Little remains at the surface of the 37-mile-wide (60 km) crater, which wasn't discovered until the 1990s. That's when shatter cones — cone-shaped, violently-shocked rock — were found in Beaverhead in southwestern Montana. The crater is centered in Challis, Idaho.

RECENT NEWS


Live Science is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

Terms and conditions
Privacy policy
Cookies policy
Topics
Update Consent
© Future US, Inc. 11 West 42nd Street, 15th Floor, New York, NY 10036.
12 Monkeys...............
1995 ‧ Science fiction film/Thriller ‧ 2h 11m a must for AFT
Back to Top
carbon20 View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: April 08 2006
Location: West Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28381
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote carbon20 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2019 at 9:56pm
12 Monkeys...............
1995 ‧ Science fiction film/Thriller ‧ 2h 11m a must for AFT
Back to Top
DeepThinker View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member
Avatar

Joined: September 26 2015
Location: So. California
Status: Offline
Points: 2275
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DeepThinker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2019 at 10:41pm
carbon being Australian... what do you think about the theory that the some time in ancient times 3/4 of the continent was wiped out by some catastrophe? I guess there is even a legend of an ancient war... something comparable to the veda texts from India?
Back to Top
carbon20 View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: April 08 2006
Location: West Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28381
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote carbon20 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2019 at 1:45am
Not sure about that,but I do know that long ago in Australias past the center of Australia was fertile and green,

But when Papua New Guinea emerged from the oceans due to volcanic activity,pushing their Highlands high in the air,

That changed the weather patterns ,hence the center of Australia is bone dry desert,

We are a vast country, but the habital areas are small, I live in the most isolated city in the world.....
Love it.....
12 Monkeys...............
1995 ‧ Science fiction film/Thriller ‧ 2h 11m a must for AFT
Back to Top
jacksdad View Drop Down
Chief Moderator
Chief Moderator
Avatar

Joined: September 08 2007
Location: San Diego
Status: Offline
Points: 43036
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jacksdad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 10 2019 at 9:29am
Originally posted by DeepThinker DeepThinker wrote:

Most of the CO2 we produce is actually absorbed in "the system".   Only a tiny amount stays in the atmosphere.   So what that tells me... without us the world would be running a carbon deficit, and we could see a catastrophic CO2 free world (or at least dangerously low levels).

If I am doing my math right... we should only have to slow down a bit for Mother Nature to catch up to us.   She is an incredible carbon sink.   You guys were fussing about nitrogen earlier in the thread... but the other super important molecule for them is CO2.   
That is if our goal is to be CO2 nuetral... but I don't even know if that is what our goal should be.   CO2 is not pollution. It is plant food! However f you want to fight pollution I am all in!


The oceans are absorbing vast amounts of CO2 - but it's increasing it's acidity at an alarming and wreaking havoc on organisms that build skeletons or shells of calcium carbonate. I suspect that the sea life that was thriving at the pH of just a few years ago would argue with your estimate of just how high carbon levels in the environment should be. That whole "CO2 is plant food" thing is nothing more than a product of lobbying by industries that cause it, and paid shills like Marc Morano.





"Buy it cheap. Stack it deep"
"Any community that fails to prepare, with the expectation that the federal government will come to the rescue, will be tragically wrong." Michael Leavitt, HHS Secretary.
Back to Top
jacksdad View Drop Down
Chief Moderator
Chief Moderator
Avatar

Joined: September 08 2007
Location: San Diego
Status: Offline
Points: 43036
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jacksdad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 10 2019 at 9:43am
Yes, we absolutely can change the composition of the atmosphere, increase temperatures by capturing more solar radiation, and change the weather. We live in a thin layer of gas clinging to the surface of the planet that is currently being loaded up with phenomenal amounts of greenhouse gases each year. This goldfish bowl is not big enough for all of us to be pooping in it at that rate without consequences.




I'll post this image again because it bears repeating. It represents all the liquid water (in green) and air (in pink) on Earth. I agree with Carbon - we need to take this much more seriously for the sake of future generations.






"Buy it cheap. Stack it deep"
"Any community that fails to prepare, with the expectation that the federal government will come to the rescue, will be tragically wrong." Michael Leavitt, HHS Secretary.
Back to Top
carbon20 View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: April 08 2006
Location: West Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28381
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote carbon20 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2019 at 6:59pm
BBC News - Climate change: Big lifestyle changes are the only answer
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-49997755
12 Monkeys...............
1995 ‧ Science fiction film/Thriller ‧ 2h 11m a must for AFT
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down