Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese


Forum Home Forum Home > Emerging Disease Tracking > Swine Flu & Seasonal Flu > Post Reply
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Online Discussion: Tracking new emerging diseases and the next pandemic

Post Reply - H1N1 virus more virulent this year


Post Reply
Name:




Message:

Emoticons
Smile Tongue Wink
Cry Big smile LOL
Dead Embarrassed Confused
Clap Angry Ouch
Star Shocked Sleepy
more...
   NoFollow is applied to all links from this forum
 Enable BBcodes
Security Code:
Code Image - Please contact webmaster if you have problems seeing this image code  Refresh Refresh Image
Powered by Web Wiz CAPTCHA version 4.04 wwf
Copyright ©2005-2013 Web Wiz
Please enter the Security Code exactly as shown in image format.
Cookies must be enabled on your web browser.

Message
Topic - H1N1 virus more virulent this year
Posted: March 08 2017 at 6:05am By Eight
The world in 1918 was in all relevant ways not as robust as we are currently. The pathogen and mode of spread was initially unknown. The pathogen was then not even understood to be a virus. The US military, though practices not mirrored today, all but fueled the pandemic from relative midwest obscurity to the global scourge it was. Proper quarantine and general hygiene was barely a factor throughout The Pandemic.

By the 1918 timeline we would have vaccines already in trials for the second wave and administered before its conclusion. Or, realistically, would be quarantining people in Kansas and the midwest after a novel influenza virus popped up with fifty times the normal case fatality rate. In any case, vaccine production would not be hit hard at all, really. 

The second wave aggregate death estimate seems high, even for 1918 Influenza. What is your source stating 90% of all 1918-1919 mortalities occurred within the main wave?