Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > Latest News
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - When killer flu struck 1918
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

When killer flu struck 1918

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: When killer flu struck 1918
    Posted: November 27 2006 at 4:34am
When killer flu struck
Jim Nesbitt, Staff Writer
Police officers in Seattle wear masks to protect them from the flu in December 1918. The pandemic killed millions.
Photo From the National Archives at College Park, Md.
 
JACKSON - In the sun-splashed autumn cool of 1918, Mabel Allen Boyd, the teenage wife of an Army soldier, was on the brink of bringing a new life into a world at war. Pregnant for the first time, she was living with her husband's parents, staying at the Boyd family farmhouse in the Mount Carmel district of Northampton County, just a few miles northeast of Jackson, the county seat.

Raymond Rochelle Boyd, a sergeant and cook she married three days before Christmas of the previous year in a quick, wartime wedding, rushed home on emergency leave from an Army training camp on Long Island to be by his wife's side as she gave birth.

She was 19, a dark-eyed brunette on the verge of motherhood. He was 23, a ruddy, round-faced farmboy with a thin mustache, pinched by the high-collared tunic of a soldier and nervous about becoming a father.

Both were stalked by a stealthy killer that would dwarf the carnage of the Western Front and the other far-flung battlefields of World War I: the silent virus of the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918-19.

With a fast-striking and deadly reach that spanned the globe, the worst influenza outbreak of the 20th century is more than a sepia-toned and horrific sidebar of history. It is also a harbinger for a future influenza disaster that medical researchers say is inevitable and long overdue, a grisly example of the worst nature has to offer.

Raymond Boyd looked healthy when he stepped off the train and arrived at his parents' house. Fresh from one of the crowded military posts that served as ready incubators for a viral monster that wiped out millions, he was unaware he was already infected and highly contagious, said his daughter from a second marriage, Kathryn Hamill of Jackson.

As the flu suddenly struck and ravaged his bed-bound body, his young wife cared for him. Soon, the virus struck her down. In separate bedrooms of his parents' farmhouse, each struggled to live.

She died. So did their baby.

His parents, worried that word of his wife's death would kill him, sneaked her coffin out of the house, covering it with hay in the wagon they slipped past their son's bedroom window. They hid his wife's death from him until the day he climbed out of his sick bed and insisted on seeing her.

Grief-stricken, he spiraled into a relapse that almost killed him.

"He blamed himself for Mabel's death," Hamill said.

Mabel Allen Boyd was one of at least 13,703 North Carolinians killed by this hyper-lethal flu virus, a mutation that still baffles modern-day scientists. Eighty-eight years after her death, she is still the face of the Spanish flu pandemic for Leon Spencer, 101, who lives in the Whitaker Glen retirement community near Five Points in Raleigh.

Before she married Raymond Boyd, Mabel lived about a mile down the dirt road that ran in front of the Spencer family farm just east of the railside Northampton County town of Seaboard.

"I was kindly stunned because she was almost like a family member," said Spencer, who was 13 in that deadly fall of 1918. "I was sorry because I thought she was a pretty young woman. I was sad."

Until he married again, Raymond Boyd honored his young, dead wife by wearing a simple gold signet ring that bore her initials on his pinkie finger.

For almost every North Carolinian buried by this remorseless killer, there was a parent or orphan, a spouse or sibling -- a loved one left behind, stunned by immediate grief and saddled with the long-running guilt of a survivor.

Just like Raymond Boyd.

'Worst case'

In truth, no one knows for sure how many died during the three waves of a universal outbreak nearly eight decades gone, because record-keeping was rudimentary.

But most modern-day historians say the body count was vastly underplayed for a pandemic now believed by some to be more lethal than the Black Death, the plague that ravaged Europe in the Middle Ages -- or the AIDS virus. They peg the American death toll at 675,000 people and the worldwide estimate between 50 million and 100 million -- about half of them adults in their 20s and 30s with robust immune systems, a marked difference from the usual victims of seasonal flu: infants and the elderly. Unlike other worldwide outbreaks, this misnamed plague did its deadliest work in two dozen weeks, not decades or centuries.

Overshadowed by the carnage of World War I, the Spanish flu pandemic now serves as the "worst-case scenario" for state and federal public health and emergency management officials scrambling to prepare for a future global outbreak of influenza. If history were to repeat itself, federal health officials say more than 2 million Americans would die and 90 million would be infected -- an Armageddon of disease that would swamp hospital systems and quickly exhaust limited supplies of medicine and equipment.

For modern-day public health officials, the Spanish flu pandemic provides a graphic object lesson of the lethal price of not responding swiftly when a future global health disaster strikes. At the time, it was ignored or downplayed by public officials and military leaders who let rallies and massive troop movements take place well after they knew the disease was on the march, aiding its rapid spread.

The reason for this colossal blunder is rooted in the war fever that dominated the times -- it made officials in North Carolina and elsewhere fearful of being seen as unpatriotic slackers. As a result, Raleigh civic leaders didn't cancel a huge Sept. 30, 1918, Liberty Loan parade and rally or a big revival on the same day at Tabernacle Baptist Church, then on South Person Street -- even as flu deaths started to accelerate dramatically in the city.

There's a crucial reason to heed the warning of yesteryear's mistake.

When the next flu pandemic strikes, it will take up to six months to produce a vaccine that specifically targets this new virus. That will force public health officials to rely on the same old-school measures that weren't applied soon enough in 1918-19 -- isolation, quarantine and the quaintly named tactic of "social distancing," which includes the closing of schools, churches, shopping malls, theaters, concert halls and sports arenas.

Until a vaccine is developed, these time-worn tools will be the primary weapons in the battle to dampen the spread of this viral killer.

Still a mystery

For scientists, the pandemic of 1918-19 provides a tantalizingly chilling challenge because they still don't know what made this strain so lethal and lightning quick -- infamous for claiming victims who felt fine in the morning but were dead by nightfall. Nor do they know why this murderously efficient virus arose simultaneously in Asia, Europe and the Americas.

"It's always been something of a mystery why that flu pandemic was so much deadlier than other pandemics," said Dr. Richard Frothingham, an associate professor of medicine at Duke University who specializes in vaccine research. "It was not just that it was new, but was there something else going on in the structure of the virus itself that made it so deadly?"

Researchers are feverishly studying the protein and genetic structure of reconstructed versions of the 1918-19 virus, the biological grandfather of all Type A flu viruses circulating among humans, hoping to resolve these unanswered questions. They hope those answers will help them develop a new vaccine for a future pandemic.

"It's the most lethal pandemic we know about. ... Unfortunately, we're still so ignorant about how these viruses work," said Jeffery Taubenberger, a senior investigator at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases who has isolated the 1918-19 virus from preserved tissue samples of the pandemic's victims.

The specter of the 1918-19 pandemic also haunts the scientific watchdogs monitoring the Asian bird flu virus they think is the most likely source of the next pandemic. It's known by its genetic call sign, H5N1, but has yet to mutate into a form that can be readily passed between humans.

As they nervously eye this virulent strain that is particularly deadly to the several hundred humans who have caught it, physicians and scientists are seeing some of the same quick-striking, lung-clogging symptoms that marked the 1918-19 virus. It turned its victims a deep blue-black color as blood and other bodily fluids choked off their oxygen supply.

This is the result of what scientists call a "cytokine storm," an out-of-control reaction by the body's immune system to an utterly alien virus, a stealthy invader able to penetrate deep into the lungs before detection.

That's why the 1918-19 strain claimed so many young adults as victims -- their vigorous immune systems responded so violently to the threat that the reaction helped kill the stricken patient. That's what makes the H5N1 avian virus so scary.

"It was horribly devastating, unbelievably lethal -- particularly among young adults," said Taubenberger of the virus that is the focal point of his studies. "And that was unprecedented."

Victims everywhere

The 1918-19 pandemic's relentless second wave slipped ashore in North Carolina in late September, probably carried into Wilmington by steamship -- possibly from Boston, site of the outbreak's first major attack in the United States, or Philadelphia, another port city where thousands eventually died and steam shovels dug trenches for mass graves.

On Sept. 21, 1918, Wilmington's first Spanish flu victim died -- William A. Wright, 28, a popular merchant and one of at least 223 New Hanover County residents killed by this deadly virus and at least 7,000 who became sick.

As September slid toward October, the pandemic quickly spread to the Piedmont and beyond, riding the rails and roads, carried by soldiers, sailors and salesmen. It fooled the best scientific minds of the times, men and women who thought they were dealing with a bacteria and wouldn't discover the pandemic's viral roots until the 1930s.

In the Tar Heel state, the prominent and the plebian were struck down by this ravaging virus and the deadly, bacterial helpmate that often followed in its wake -- pneumonia. Victims included Edward Kidder Graham, 42, president of the University of North Carolina, and his interim successor, Marvin Hendrix Stacy, also 42, who died in January 1919, struck during the pandemic's wintry third wave.

Like a scythe, it cut down Lucy Page, 37, and Eliza Riddick, 24, two Raleigh volunteers who tended flu-stricken students at N.C. State University. It also snuffed the life of Bessie Roper, 29, of Asheville, a volunteer who nursed flu-stricken students at UNC.

A water-fountain memorial was built in Riddick's and Page's names and once stood in front of the old Wake County courthouse. Riddick's 21-year-old brother, William, described in newspaper accounts as a well-known man-about-town nicknamed "Rout," died Oct. 8, 1918, a week before his sister did.

Another Raleigh volunteer, Ernest Royall Carroll, 41, died Nov. 15, 1918 -- two months after registering for the draft -- after serving in a soup line for flu-sickened refugees at his church, Tabernacle Baptist. Carroll, who formed one of Raleigh's first Boy Scout troops, was one of 30 church members killed by the pandemic, including four deacons and a former pastor, a history of the church notes.

Signs in obituaries

While the virus was killing scores of people in Raleigh, Winston-Salem, Charlotte, Wilmington and Fayetteville, the front pages of North Carolina newspapers were dominated by reports of American troops launching a bloody offensive in the Meuse-Argonne sector of the Western Front -- leavened by flu stories only on occasion.

As a result, the telltales of the pandemic's lethal assault in North Carolina are buried in the funeral notices of the society pages or relegated to inside stories that invariably emphasized the rosy belief of public officials who claimed the worst had passed.

Even this muted coverage is stark and sobering. Roxboro had more than 600 flu cases by Oct. 8, 1918, and 13 funerals for flu victims on a single Monday.

There were 32 flu deaths in Durham by Oct. 17; 36 deaths in Raleigh by Oct. 15, including at least five N.C. State students. Raleigh's death toll rose to 82 by Oct. 21 and 100 by Oct. 24, with a canvass of 3,561 homes revealing 1,380 flu cases.

In one house, canvassers found the body of a man whose wife was recovering in bed from the birth of their 4-day-old child, unable to find anybody to prepare her husband's corpse for burial. The dead in Raleigh included James E. Moore, 22, an engineer on the Seaboard Air Line railroad, and C.W. Robbins, a student at Shaw University -- like Wright of Wilmington, young victims who were the preferred demographic of this pandemic.

"We've almost forgotten the horror of the war in the seriousness of the influenza epidemic," wrote Ray Tillinghast in a letter archived at Duke University and written to her cousin Carrie, a young Fayetteville woman who was serving as a nurse in France with the American Expeditionary Force. "The country has never known anything like it."

The death toll of the Spanish flu pandemic is staggering, even by the crude statistical measures of the time. It was enough to carve a dozen years off America's average life expectancy; enough to cause North Carolina's 1918 influenza death rate to leap to a level 20 times higher than 1917.

Consider this: More Americans died during the Spanish flu pandemic than were killed in battle during all of America's wars -- from the Revolutionary War through the Civil War, both World Wars and the current conflict in Iraq.

And during World War I, 80 percent as many soldiers and sailors died of flu and pneumonia as those who died in combat, historians say. Military flu victims died by the thousands -- in troop ships crossing the Atlantic and base camps in France.

But training camps in America were the real killing ground for this ruthless virus. Tents and hastily constructed barracks were overcrowded with soldiers and sailors who shuttled across the country before shipping out to France as part of an unprecedented, worldwide migration of millions driven by the demands of war.

This was an ancient precursor to the global transportation network that spans the globe today and would guarantee the wildfire spread of a future pandemic.

Worse than war

The pandemic's onslaught fostered fear and isolation, wrote Samuel Lewis Morgan, pastor of First Baptist Church in hard-hit Henderson when the pandemic struck.

"The disease struck terror everywhere. ... Soon I learned the tragic loneliness of the people," Morgan wrote in memoirs archived at UNC-Chapel Hill.

Morgan, who also led churches in Creedmoor, Smithfield, Lillington and Ramseur during a 38-year career, tried to combat this isolation by visiting members of his church before they or their loved ones became gravely ill.

But the flu struck him down and doctors ordered him confined to his bed, isolated from the rest of his family. Only his wife, Isabelle, could enter the room -- and only if she wore a mask.

He listened to the church bells of Henderson celebrating the Nov. 11 end of World War I from his sickbed.

"The epidemic I remember with more horror than the war," Morgan wrote. "It killed some lovely people and pillars in the churches."

For Leon Spencer, who now lives in Raleigh at Whitaker Glen, the killing horror of the pandemic is captured in a farmboy's memory of his parents naming the dead, the dying and the suddenly stricken.

In the five autumn weeks that marked the worldwide outbreak's deadliest peak, Spencer and his siblings listened to a daily toll of friends and neighbors so routine, yet overwhelming, his parents forgot to shield their children from the unrelenting reality.

Spencer's grandmother, Mary Smith Spencer, died of pneumonia in March 1918 after a bout with the flu, a likely victim of the pandemic's relatively mild first wave.

But at a time when death seemed like the commonplace passage of fall into winter, Spencer remembers his grandmother's passing because her burial took place on his father's birthday -- not as a blood-close reminder of a global health catastrophe.

For Spencer, still sharp and active after more than a century of life, the pandemic he lived through in his teens was a time of shuttered churches and schools, a town doctor on the run from dawn until midnight and the names of the suddenly departed passed between his parents.

"There were a lot of people getting sick and my parents would talk about people dying," Spencer said. "That lingers with me. I didn't know them all personally, but I knew they were young."

Just as young as Mabel Allen Boyd

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 27 2006 at 4:50am
It tells us what it would be like!Great post! We need to look at 1918 to see what we may face.We can learn from history.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 27 2006 at 5:03am
Thank you Happy Camper.
Beth
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 27 2006 at 7:35am
I'm speechless, thank you.
Back to Top
daisymay View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: November 25 2006
Location: American Samoa
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote daisymay Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 27 2006 at 7:37am
History repeats.
it could be worse
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2006 at 3:33pm
I've been reading a lot about the way people behaved and how they coped...I know it's going to be so much worst but it does give us and idea.
 
 
 
Back to Top
Phil View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Phil Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2015 at 11:47am
Wow. I think that is a very sad story. Let them REST IN PEACE
Back to Top
carbon20 View Drop Down
Moderator
Moderator
Avatar

Joined: April 08 2006
Location: West Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 65816
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote carbon20 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2015 at 4:21pm
1918 Flu Pandemic That Killed 50 Million Originated in China, Historians Say
Chinese laborers transported across Canada thought to be source.
By Dan Vergano National Geographic

PUBLISHED 

Photo of patience in an influence ward in France in 1918.

Patients lie in an influenza ward at a U.S. Army camp hospital in Aix-les-Baines, France, during World War I.

 

The global flu outbreak of 1918 killed 50 million people worldwide, ranking as one of the deadliest epidemics in history.

For decades, scientists have debated where in the world the pandemic started, variously pinpointing its origins in France, China, the American Midwest, and beyond. Without a clear location, scientists have lacked a complete picture of the conditions that bred the disease and factors that might lead to similar outbreaks in the future.

The deadly "Spanish flu" claimed more lives than World War I, which ended the same year the pandemic struck. Now, new research is placing the flu's emergence in a forgotten episode of World War I: the shipment of Chinese laborers across Canada in sealed train cars.

Historian Mark Humphries of Canada's Memorial University of Newfoundland says that newly unearthed records confirm that one of the side stories of the war—the mobilization of 96,000 Chinese laborers to work behind the British and French lines on World War I's Western Front—may have been the source of the pandemic.

Photo of patience in an influence ward in France in 1918.

Writing in the January issue of the journal War in History, Humphries acknowledges that his hypothesis awaits confirmation by viral samples from flu victims. Such evidence would tie the disease's origin to one location.

But some other historians already find his argument convincing.

"This is about as close to a smoking gun as a historian is going to get," says historian James Higgins, who lectures at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, and who has researched the 1918 spread of the pandemic in the United States. "These records answer a lot of questions about the pandemic."

Last of the Great Plagues

The 1918 flu pandemic struck in three waves across the globe, starting in the spring of that year, and is tied to a strain of H1N1 influenza ancestral to ones still virulent today.

The outbreak killed even the young and healthy, turning their strong immune systems against them in a way that's unusual for flu. Adding to the catastrophic loss of lives during World War I, the epidemic may have played a role in ending the war.

"The 1918 flu was the last of the great plagues that struck humanity, and it followed in the tracks of a global conflict," says Humphries.

Even as the pandemic's origins have remained a mystery, the Chinese laborers have previously been suggested as a source of the disease.

Historian Christopher Langford has shown that China suffered a lower mortality rate from the Spanish flu than other nations did, suggesting some immunity was at large in the population because of earlier exposure to the virus.

In the new report, Humphries finds archival evidence that a respiratory illness that struck northern China in November 1917 was identified a year later by Chinese health officials as identical to the Spanish flu.

He also found medical records indicating that more than 3,000 of the 25,000 Chinese Labor Corps workers who were transported across Canada en route to Europe starting in 1917 ended up in medical quarantine, many with flu-like symptoms.

Origins Debated

The Spanish flu reached its height in autumn 1918 but raged until 1920, initially gaining its nickname from wartime censorship rules that allowed for reporting on the disease's ravages in neutral Spain.

Physicians began debating the origin of the pandemic almost as soon as it appeared, Higgins says, with historians soon joining them.

France's wartime trenches, ridden with filth, disease, and death, were originally seen as the flu's breeding ground. The flu's tendency to strike young adults was explained as the disease targeting itself to young soldiers in trenches. The theory also purported to explain how the illness spread from Europe to cities such as Boston and Philadelphia by pointing a finger at returning troop ships.

A decade after the war, Kansas was identified as another possible breeding ground, due to reports of an influenza outbreak there that spread to a nearby Army camp in March 1918, killing 48 doughboys.

But in his study, Humphries reports that an outbreak of respiratory infections, which at the time were dubbed an endemic "winter sickness" by local health officials, were causing dozens of deaths a day in villages along China's Great Wall. The illness spread 300 miles (500 kilometers) in six weeks' time in late 1917.

At first thought to be pneumonic plague, the disease killed at a far lower rate than is typical for that disease.

Humphries discovered that a British legation official in China wrote that the disease was actually influenza, in a 1918 report. Humphries made the findings in searches of Canadian and British historical archives that contain the wartime records of the Chinese Labor Corps and the British legation in Beijing.

Sealed Railcars

At the time of the outbreak, British and French officials were forming the Chinese Labor Corps, which eventually shipped some 94,000 laborers from northern China to southern England and France during the war.

"The idea was to free up soldiers to head to the front at a time when they were desperate for manpower," Humphries says.

Shipping the laborers around Africa was too time-consuming and tied up too much shipping, so British officials turned to shipping the laborers to Vancouver on the Canadian West Coast and sending them by train to Halifax on the East Coast, from which they could be sent to Europe.

So desperate was the need for labor that on March 2, 1918, a ship loaded with 1,899 Chinese Labor Corps men left the Chinese port of Wehaiwei for Vancouver despite "plague" stopping the recruiting for workers there.

In reaction to anti-Chinese feelings rife in western Canada at the time, the trains that carried the workers from Vancouver were sealed, Humphries says. Special Railway Service Guards watched the laborers, who were kept in camps surrounded by barbed wire. Newspapers were banned from reporting on their movement.

Roughly 3,000 of the workers ended up in medical quarantine, their illnesses often blamed on their "lazy" natures by Canadian doctors, Humphries said: "They had very stereotypical, racist views of the Chinese."

Doctors treated sore throats with castor oil and sent the Chinese back to their camps.

The Chinese laborers arrived in southern England by January 1918 and were sent to France, where the Chinese Hospital at Noyelles-sur-Mer recorded hundreds of their deaths from respiratory illness.

Historians have suggested that the Spanish influenza mutated and became most deadly in spring 1918, spreading from Europe to ports as far apart as Boston and Freetown, Sierra Leone.

By the height of the global pandemic that autumn, however, no more such cases were reported among the Chinese laborers in Europe.

Medical Evidence

Humphries concedes that a final answer to the mystery of the Spanish flu's origins is still a ways off.

"What we really need is a sample of the virus preserved in a burial for the medical experts to uncover," Humphries says. "That would have the best chances of settling the debate."

For the last decade, experts such as Jeffery Taubenberger, of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, have sought burial samples across continents, seeking to find preserved samples of the virus in victims of the outbreak.

Taubenberger led a team in 2011 that looked at flu virus samples taken from autopsies of 32 victims of the 1918 outbreak.

The earliest sample found so far was from a U.S. soldier who died on May 11, 1918, at Camp Dodge, Idaho, but the team is looking for earlier cases.

A broad number of samples from flu victims before and after the pandemic might finally narrow down its origins. Essentially, scientists would need a genetically identified sample of the influenza's H1N1 virus taken from a victim who died before the first widespread outbreak of the pandemic in spring 1918 to point to a time and place as the likely origin point of the pandemic.

One from China in 1917, for example, would fill the bill.

"I'm not sure if this question can ever be fully answered," Taubenberger cautions, noting that even the origin of a smaller flu pandemic in 2009 still eludes certainty.

Ultimately, "these kinds of [historical] analyses cannot definitively reveal the origins and patterns of spread of emerging pathogens, especially at the early stages of the outbreak," Taubenberger said, of the new historical report.

In the end, however, knowing the origin of the disease might provide information that could help stop a future pandemic, making the search worthwhile.

"I would say that the takeaway message of all of this is to keep your eye on China" as a source of emerging diseases, Higgins says. He points to concerns about avian flu and the SARS virus, both arising from Asia in the last decade.

The SARS outbreak claimed perhaps 775 lives in 2003, and avian flu A (H5N1) has killed 384 people since 2003, according to the World Health Organization, which is carefully watching for signs of an outbreak of the diseases.

"We have seen a lot of emerging diseases travel around the world in recent decades," Higgins says.

History has a way of repeating, he says, and research into the origins of the 1918 flu could help prevent a scourge like that from happening again.

Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.🖖

Marcus Aurelius
Back to Top
arirish View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: June 19 2013
Location: Arkansas
Status: Offline
Points: 39215
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote arirish Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 26 2015 at 9:58am
carbon20- Good read! Thanks!
Buy more ammo!
Back to Top
Dutch Josh View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group


Joined: May 01 2013
Location: Arnhem-Netherla
Status: Offline
Points: 95367
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dutch Josh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 27 2015 at 4:17am
http://www.savethemales.ca/001836.html, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_biological_warfare

By the turn of the 20th century, advances in microbiology had made thinking about "germ warfare" part of the zeitgeistJack London, in his short story '"Yah! Yah! Yah!"' (1909), described a punitive European expedition to a South Pacific island deliberately exposing the Polynesian population to measles, of which many of them died. While much of the material for London's South Sea Tales is derived from his personal experience in the region, it is not known whether this particular incident is historical. London went on to write a science fiction tale, "The Unparalleled Invasion" (1910), in which the Western nations wipe out all of China with a biological attack.

First World War[edit]

During the First World War (1914–1918), the Empire of Germany made some early attempts at biological warfare.Those attempts were made by special sabotage group headed by Rudolf Nadolny. Using diplomatic pouches and couriers, the German General Staff supplied small teams of saboteurs in the Russian Duchy of Finland, and in the then-neutral countries of Romania, the United States, and Argentina.[citation needed] In Finland, saboteurs mounted on reindeer placed ampoules of anthrax in stables of Russian horses in 1916.[30] Anthrax was also supplied to the German military attaché in Bucharest, as was glanders, which was employed against livestock destined for Allied service. Germanintelligence officer and US citizen Dr. Anton Casimir Dilger established a secret lab in the basement of his sister's home in Chevy Chase, Maryland, that produced glanders which was used to infect livestock in ports and inland collection points including, at least, Newport NewsNorfolkBaltimore, and New York, and probably St. Louis and Covington, Kentucky. In Argentina, German agents also employed glanders in the port of Buenos Aires and also tried to ruin wheat harvests with a destructive fungus.

The Geneva Protocol of 1925 prohibited the use of chemical weapons and biological weapons, but said nothing about experimentation, production, storage, or transfer; later treaties did cover these aspects. Twentieth-century advances in microbiology enabled the first pure-culture biological agents to be developed by World War II.

We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.
~Albert Einstein
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down