Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk |
Exponential Growth - Stop and Read Immediately |
Post Reply | Page <1 7891011 19> |
Author | |
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Here's something that will flip your lid to think about..
t generally takes 3-4 weeks to die after infection. If there are suddenly 18 deaths in Iran as of today (from 0 beginning yesterday), it should be obvious the virus has been circulating a while, because people don't all of sudden die immediately upon infection. In other words, likely since or before Jan. 22..So, Iran, now, at 18 deaths, and at a 2% CFR, implies there were 900 infections 3-4 WEEKS ago, and it has been spreading unrecognized since then. SO...How many today? My guess? 20,000-40,000 have it now in Iran. No joke. When COVID-19 exploded from Wuhan because they could no longer conceal it from the world, it was Jan. 21, with estimates of 75,000 infected or so. But back on December 31st, there were 41 serious cases, probably of a larger group that perhaps numbered a 500-1000 by 12/31. It's that kind of history that is illustrative. It seems that neither the world, nor Iran, apparently, doesn't yet fully understand or appreciate the complete nature of the storm that is upon them or will soon be (or they do, and will try to crack down worse than China). Same logic applies with S. Korea, suddenly 7 deaths. Circulating for weeks. 763 confirmed at the moment. Likely thousands more. For weeks. Traveling to other parts of S. Korea, Japan, Asia, Indonesia, the United States, Europe...probably right now...may not even know they are infected. Right now, anywhere. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
My prediction for the US at the moment? Because of the scandalous lack of testing, we may see in the next few weeks (2-3 perhaps) a few sudden reports of severe pneumonia and deaths from COVID-19 from currently unknown infected. Yes, deaths, "out of the blue." I hope I'm wrong, but I wouldn't say it if I didn't think it was a strong possibility.
|
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
Up late, can't sleep. 2,330 cases and climbing by the minute.
As I mentioned before, friends, things will start to move very quickly. Iranian cases now showing up in Bahrain and Kuwait (Canada), reports of 50+ deaths in Qom, Iran, by the mayor, reports of testing limit breaches in Italy (where the local mayor was also symptomatic), massive additional testing in S. Korea, positive Koreans in Israel, it's all erupting in many places simultaneously it seems. It will increase even further. I fear people who haven't really considered this possibility are going to start to panic, unfortunately. At the moment, I'm considering accepting the possibility that the old exponential models I was using are now no longer valid, and the international world has entered a new exponential, possibly hyperbolic, phase. I still have to work out what that may look look in this next phase of spread. But, I think we may reach 10,000 cases not only by March 7-9, or March 5th, but sooner, and perhaps in even a week. It may take two weeks from now to see that this has been the case, though. The way the numbers are climbing reminds me of the early phases of Wuhan confirmations. Essentially, the infections already exist, they had weeks to grow and spread, and now it's just a matter of testing/confirmation catching up. Fairly soon, after perhaps a new exponential, or even hyperbolic stage, and mitigation, the rise will start to curve back down on the log chart, as we have seen with the China data, but I think it will be an enormous, ongoing, country by country, battle worldwide, and it's only just begun. The following charts are what I'm considering at the moment. The first, is a basic primer on the way these two curves, exponential and hyperbolic would look in a case like this. The second, is an example of the early phases of Wuhan's confirmation, before I think Xi's directive to squelch the data. One should also keep in mind, too, at some point, many governments will just stop (or not even start) testing and focus scarce resources on emergency medical care and community mitigation efforts. That's what I'll be doing in a sense as well, preparing. Take care. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
As a great example, South Korea's confirmation rate (this is yesterday's data) is hyperbolic at the moment. I fear the world is going to be like this soon. This long case incubation period is like the world's longest ticking time bomb. The fuse was lit in South Korea, Iran, and Italy weeks ago, now we are seeing the results. It's probably already well-established, but unreported yet, in other places...Malaysia? India?
|
|
Pandemic
Adviser Group Joined: January 31 2020 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 2725 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Surely, the hyperbolic phase would be temporary as the the current doubling rate outside of China appears rapid.
Sadly, we did not learn from the Wuhan disaster. World governments could have shut down all transport systems for a period of time. This action alone could have saved the unfolding scenario. Now its a case of catchupđż |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
Yes, exactly, it will probably be temporary, and merely reflect the testing confirmation rate.
And, no, we did not learn from the Wuhan disaster. The world squandered precious time to prepare, in my opinion. But that's entirely predictable human nature, no? The next phase will be a battle. City by city, country by country. Some countries will try to contain it (keep it out), and some countries will try to mitigate it, stop people inside from infecting others inside, or both. Dr. Osterholm said that it's silly to try to contain it, it acts like the flu, and it's like fighting the wind. |
|
Newbie1A
Adviser Group Joined: January 26 2018 Location: Alberta Status: Offline Points: 11180 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Isn't this in a way a good sign though? If say 30,000 have it and now a 100 die, doesn't that mean that the rate of death from this is way lower then 2%? Maybe I'm looking at this wrong (another sleepless night) but if 30,000 have it and even if takes another few weeks for the deaths to catch up, won't the CFR end up being way lower? I'm hoping... Or are you thinking that if 30k have now in another few weeks at 2% CFR there will 600 dead? This whole looking in the review mirror as someone said, sure makes calculating numbers harder... And again - I think the 'other fallout' economic, lack of hospital/ICU beds even for other conditions, panic of Joe Public etc etc will cause more death then the illness itself... but death is death and when it's a loved one it hurts just the same regardless of cause. |
|
If it's to be - it's up to me!
|
|
Newbie1A
Adviser Group Joined: January 26 2018 Location: Alberta Status: Offline Points: 11180 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
I was talking to 2 different ppl yesterday - one said, "I don't know how serious this really is, the media are saying nothing, govt' is doing nothing". I replied "once all of a sudden we have a bunch of deaths from it and no one knows 'where' they caught it from - panic will hit and ppl will take it seriously". Till then - it's just a problem 'on the other side of the world'! I agree 100% on this one. It's pushed every button I don't have that our government has done NOTHING to protect the Canadian people! It has not stopped flights from China (or any other form of incoming traffic), everything is 'voluntary' (oh, if you don't mind could you possibly just stay in your home for a couple weeks!?!?!), etc. Clueless! As many have said, the waste of a precious time window that China gave. |
|
If it's to be - it's up to me!
|
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
Good chart (but ignore China numbers, they're bunk). It includes number tested - reasonably accurate - current US CDC numbers on website is 426. Some recent information missing (like Italy's testing data)
|
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It's also possible there may be waves of fluctuating numbers, as clusters erupt and fall, and countries become infected, try to contain/mitigate, until other places, countries erupt anew. So if numbers start to fall, it may be just a lull. |
|
Pixie
Admin Group Joined: June 05 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 19668 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Did you get a bit of shut eye? We will probably all burn the midnite oil going forward!
I was thinking today ,Diamond Princess which is still producing positives,gave a fairly accurate how contagious,but now with as many 2/3 cases circulating quietly with staggered incubation days,we will never have an accurate case number,so how can we really get a real CFR? The goal post is constantly moving. Haven't checked Italy count ,last count 180? With 7 deaths,that's heading towards CFR of 5% base on these figures. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I think some things will cancel out, SK testing lots, proportionally few positives; Iran testing near nil, more deaths; Italy has testing efficiency problems I read. Ultimately, over time, I think the intl, rate should approximate pretty closely, considering it's spread out over multiple countries that are fairly honest about their data (except China), and that's why I posted the separate thread. Now, I think some countries are purposefully under-testing (US, Indonesia, India, etc.), but only time will tell how that turns out.
|
|
ksc
Adviser Group Joined: February 09 2020 Status: Offline Points: 10995 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Percent of world infected by virus...
10% 5% 1% .05% .005% 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Dec 1 Jan 1 Feb 1 Mar 1 |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi and welcome KSC - yes, that'd be a good chart to build. All the fanshy-shmanshy 'experts' are telling us to just shut up and take our pandemic like good little children, while they sat on their asses and worried about not offending their market masters (CHINA, etc.) when the warning signs were flashing RED, it could still be contained, etc etc....only a few will die if we don't panic. BULL*%^#!
|
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
double post
|
|
Tabitha111
Adviser Group Joined: January 11 2020 Location: Virginia Status: Offline Points: 11640 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Can someone explain to me about the WHO not using the word "pandemic" anymore? Does that mean that there will not be one declared at all, even if it meets the definition? I am confused.
|
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
By the way, Marc Lipsitch, Harvard, one of premier infectious diseases experts in the world, said his best guess is currently 100-200 cases circulating in the US right now. I agree, but think it's probably more, and will be more, soon. At 2% CFR in 3-4 weeks, right about now, we should start seeing some serious cases about now. The next 2-3 weeks should be rather interesting.
https://twitter.com/mlipsitch About pandemic verbiage, the WHO is clueless, you can read some of the tweets on Twitter, here's a sample: https://twitter.com/DrEricDing There are no "phases" anymore, nor 'declarations'. It's all just continued word play and intentional confusion, in my opinion. It's a travesty. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Quote:
- "Serious mistake was made not to quarantine people who arrived in Italy from China" said Walter Ricciardi of the WHO, *Comment: Gee, ya think?* adding that "within two weeks we will know if we are facing an epidemic" and advising that, for the next two weeks, people "should avoid crowded places: metro, buses, trains, schools, discos, and gyms." https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries --- The US is also going to learn the hard way it should have mandated quarantine for all visitors who had been in China, not just Wuhan or Hubei...In fact, worldwide, even better. But, then again, that would require bold leadership from the WHO, or the UN, and let's face it, that wasn't about to happen because China would have whined. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
If anyone hasn't read this article yet, please do:
"Lipsitch predicts that, within the coming year, some 40 to 70 percent of people around the world will be infected with the virus that causes COVID-19. But, he clarifies emphatically, this does not mean that all will have severe illnesses. âItâs likely that many will have mild disease, or may be asymptomatic,â he said. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/02/covid-vaccine/607000/ -- The pandemic has started. But, I truly disagree it will be a mild hit. It will upheave societies and reverberate for months. Unless a country can impose draconian crackdowns like China and isolate an entire province (where supposedly the CFR is 4%- my best guess is there have been 50,000 deaths or more), everyone's in for a heap of trouble. At 1% CFR and a severity rate of 4% (now on the lower side I think, with continually updated intl data, that will mean shocking numbers of deaths... Do the math. Follow the logic. Lipsitch, cautious Harvard epi. expert: 40-70% of the globe = 7.5 Billion * (.4 to .7) = 3.0 to 5.25 BILLION INFECTED 1% of 3-5.25 BILLION? 30 - 52.5 MILLION PEOPLE DEAD 4% SEVERE ILL? 140 to 210 MILLION SEVERELY ILL. This was just a projection for 1917/18 Influenza pandemic redux for the modern era. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
many of these are imported cases, but still they're here.
|
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Ok, time for some review of prior projections, to see how well they fared.
Today is later on 2/24, and there are 2,491 worldwide infections outside of China (38 deaths). I'll start with the scariest chart (not mine) from the beginning of this thread. It didn't happen *yet* for many reasons. China shut down, essentially completely, Then, they burned the data along with their dead. No one believes there are only 2600 dead and only 70,000 infected in China. Not the US, not any serious expect. The undercount is by a factor of at least 5-10 times. Maybe, though, China, bought the world some time. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
This, though, was one of my first projections of international infections. It's held up pretty well, I would say.
Predicted 1,000 within a few days, 2,000 the day of, and we're on track for 3,000 by the 27th. It also projected significant escape within 45-60 days from the 8th, roughly March 24-April 8th. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
This doubling chart was a low estimate, already.
While this 14% chart was quite accurate till now, and now, is low. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
This chart is also still quite accurate at the moment. If you look where we should be for the 23rd and 24th (each minor line on the left axis is another 1,000 cases from 1,000 to 10,000 major lines), it matches up very well.
|
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
This chart is also still very accurate:
But this is low already |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
This one is essentially BANG ON (just slightly under 2500, where we are at this minute).
While this exponential a bit under. (In fact, that's a pattern, the straight-line log charts seem to be more accurate than the exponential ones) |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Again, the doubling chart is way off, and under, which suggests doubling time may be less than 6 after all, perhaps 5, or even 4, as I mentioned way earlier in this thread.
This one is still an open question. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
This one looks fairly conservative, and likely to be accurate (a low to minimum case scenario) in the next few weeks.
And this one is now a low projection |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Finally, a couple more recent ones.
These two still look ok now, but a few more days will tell. I have the sense something has definitely shifted and we'll see an explosive rise, shortly, but I do try to just look at the numbers and see what they're telling us. |
|
KiminNM
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 22 2020 Location: NM Status: Offline Points: 6605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
BabyCat, I am so appreciative of your work. And, please, STOP BEING RIGHT! lol
Just kidding. I've finally learned to pre-medicate before looking at your graphs. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks. Sometimes I don't like being right. But it's my nature to try. The above I'd love to be wrong about. |
|
BeachMama
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 25 2020 Location: Southwest US Status: Offline Points: 3080 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
My husband walked in as I was looking at your charts, and immediately asked, âHey, are you okay?â
I told him yeah and asked why he thought I wasnât. âYou were looking really troubled as you looked at your phone right now.â âOh â I was looking at BabyCatâs graphs about the virus.â He just nodded knowingly and went to bed. LOL |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Lol, exponential numbers are spooky, except when I imagine earning continuously compounded interest...
Math joke: Q:Do you know why the absolute value function (ex: |x|=x, |-x|=x ) is always the most optimistic function? A: Because it turns every negative into a positive. Maybe I should use those in my charts... |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Back to bad news:
A WHO expert warns of outbreaks in other countries 'increasing at exponential growth rates' snip WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said the peak in China occurred between January 23 and February 2 and the number of new cases there "has been declining steadily since then." However, WHO expert Bruce Aylward, leader of a joint WHO-China mission of experts, warned on Monday of outbreaks in other countries "increasing at exponential growth rates." https://www.rappler.com/world/regions/asia-pacific/252627-death-toll-novel-coronavirus-february-25-2020? --- NOW they tell us? I could have told them that a few weeks ago, as could many. Exponential doesn't just mean big, you see. It means, do they fit along an exponential curve?? More incompetence from supposed subject matter experts at the WHO. They should be fired and replaced, starting with the Tedros idiot at the top. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Now, for some really scary s%$%!
From recent press conf. of Joint WHO-CHINA mission: Given my post above, let's run the numbers from Marc Lipsitch's estimate for the 40-70% of the world infected by COVID-19 shall we? 7.5 Billion people - 40-70 % infected -> 3 - 5.25 BILLION 13.8% SEVERE -> 414 MILLION to 724,500,000 MILLION PEOPLE VERY SICK 6.1% CRITICAL -> 183 MILLION TO 320.25 MILLION PEOPLE IN CRITICAL CONDITION 2.3% FATALITY RATE? --> 69 MILLION to 120.75 MILLION DEAD --- This is not a drill. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
2/3 of the cases are below the water circulating around the world right now...
|
|
FluMom
Adviser Group Valued Member Since 2006 Joined: February 03 2020 Location: Colorado Status: Offline Points: 14695 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
They will have to close schools churches kid sports professional sports concerts. This is going to get interesting.
|
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
Notice the green on the lower chart. People are getting infected in their home countries. China is no longer the source of most new infections. The same is likely true for other countries. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
Good morning - early on Feb 25, and 2705 infections and climbing. As projected back on the 8th, we'll likely hit 3,000 by Feb. 27th, maybe even today or tomorrow.
The following charts are mostly from yesterday's data. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Important clarification from Marc Lipsitch:
-- ncreased confidence in claims: Since I wrote this, large numbers of cases have appeared in new countries (Iran, Italy) or increased dramatically (S. Korea), increasing the evidence that this will become or already is a pandemic. Marc Lipsitch @mlipsitch ¡ 2h Modified in light of evolving evidence: 1) The 40-70% figure strictly speaking is only a sensible prediction for adults. Detected infections in kids to date are rare. Can happen, but rare. Still unclear if they are rarely infected or just so mild that they are rarely detected. Marc Lipsitch @mlipsitch ¡ 2h Until we know, safest to reserve the predictions for adults. 2) Increasing evidence that the extremely intense control measures in China have reduced transmission while they are in force. As long as such intense control measures are in place it is possible to imagine... Marc Lipsitch @mlipsitch ¡ 2h keeping the number infected well below 40%. I don't believe most countries (maybe not even China) can keep such controls for months or a year, the minimum time frame for potentially having a vaccine. But even more moderate ones if effective could reduce incidence considerably Marc Lipsitch @mlipsitch ¡ 2h So in light of @WHO 's statements of the last days that these measures have been super effective, this seems the most likely way the 40% lower bound could be too high. I very much hope this is the case, but we do need to think about what controls like that for months mean. Marc Lipsitch @mlipsitch Replying to @mlipsitch @MauSantillana and 3 others Summary: Should have said 40-70% of adults in a situation without effective controls. --- https://twitter.com/mlipsitch/status/1232427654802026497 == What I think this means is that if you live under a totalitarian regime like China, you might have a pretty good chance. |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Some updated projections:
2/25/20 evening, and at 2,931 so far (close to 3,000 as projected). Perhaps it will pass 3,000 tonight, but for sure by the end of tomorrow. Here's the current projections, if spread continues similarly. This assumption, to me, is reasonable because the world has tried its best to stop the virus from spreading through travel restrictions, screening, quarantines, contact tracing, etc., but the infectious spread just marches on as the exponential trend has demonstrated. In fact, I think there is a risk for explosive growth in areas which are unable to respond quickly enough (e.g. Iran) or places with high rates of travel and urban concentration (Europe), and there may be a "Wuhan" moment somewhere, where the virus suddenly erupts. Not sure where, but perhaps Japan, Europe, or Iran. The fact that more than several Iranian travel cases (people who visited Iran) are now being confirmed as positive in other countries signals a very large and significant spread (as does the story of the Deputy chief of Health in Iran becoming infected), the US CDC and State Dept travel warnings to S. Korean, Japan, etc., and Japanese decision to focus efforts on mitigation rather than containment signals significant spread very, very soon. 5,000 by Feb. 29 10,000 by March 5 100,000 by March 20 1,000,000 by April 5 10,000,000 by April 19 |
|
Post Reply | Page <1 7891011 19> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |