Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > General Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - FLU Spread & multiple "Hot Zones"
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

FLU Spread & multiple "Hot Zones"

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: FLU Spread & multiple "Hot Zones"
    Posted: February 21 2006 at 7:17am
New flu is likely to spread differently

February 21, 2006

Unlike the 1918 flu that circled the globe with unremitting ferocity, a
pandemic strain today probably would emerge as a series of hot zones,
possibly straining medical efforts to contain the deadly outbreaks,
scientists report today.

With bird flu sweeping through more and more flocks in global regions
far from the infection's Asian origins, researchers say the potential of the
H5N1 virus mutating, which would allow it to spread easily among
humans, is increasingly likely.


Most recently, the virus has been reported in 11 European countries and
in Africa, Iran and India. Since bird flu's reemergence in 2003, there have
been more than 160 human cases worldwide, about half of them fatal,
from Indonesia to Turkey.

Now, in one of the first government-funded computer models of a human
pandemic spawned by H5N1, a team of researchers theorizes that
infections would initially emerge in influenza hot zones.

"You could think of it this way: It would be like a fire throwing out
sparks," said Carl Bergstrom, a theoretical biologist at the University of
Washington in Seattle.

"Multiple sparks could mean fires cropping up in a lot of different places
at once. The aim is to successfully contain each of these fires. We think
containment is critical," he said.

Containment means reaching a pandemic source as early as possible and
applying public health tools such as vaccination, antiviral therapy and
quarantine.

Additional containment activities would include "stepping up the rate of
culling or vaccinating poultry and accelerating the production of human
vaccines," Bergstrom said.

He and colleagues at Harvard's School of Public Health contend that
resources to fight the flu might be strained in this country and elsewhere.

Because containment is a component of federal and World Health
Organization planning for a possible flu pandemic, the new model helps
show the possible pitfalls.

Bergstrom said containment escaped public health officials in the lethal
pandemic season 87 years ago, a reason the infection swept so
aggressively, killing 50 million people worldwide and more than 600,000
in the United States. Bergstrom, Christina Mills, James Robins and Marc
Lipsitch provide details of their research in a report released today on the
online scientific journal PLoS, the Public Library of Science.

The new model of pandemic influenza is one of several expected over the
next few months from an international research network developing
computer-based simulations of a global flu outbreak.

The models are designed to help public health workers better understand
the spread of contagious diseases and their potential impact on public
health

In Manhattan, Betsey McCaughey, former lieutenant governor of New York
and founder of the nonprofit Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths, said
recipes for pandemic flu containment should be incorporated into
hospital disaster plans.

She argues that a killer flu could prove difficult to fight because some
hospitals "lack the discipline and training to control simple bacteria.

"The mortality in the United States would depend, at least initially, on how
well prepared hospitals are when the first patients come in for treatment.
Rigorous plans will have to be in place, otherwise it will rage through
hospitals on gloves, hands, equipment and uniforms."


http://www.newsday.com/news/health/ny-hsbird214635478feb21,0 ,2577647.story?coll=ny-health-print
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2006 at 7:23am
Bird flu likely to burst out again and again: study

Mon Feb 20, 2006 (excerpt)

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Bird flu is likely to cross over into people again
and again if it ever even once acquires the ability to pass from human to
human, experts predicted on Monday.

In theory, the virus only has to mutate once, in one person, to spark a
pandemic. But the researchers argue that this could happen again and
again, in several places around the world.

They said even if the current pandemic killing birds passes, no one
should breathe a sign of relief because the threat to people will not be
gone.


http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=scienceN ews&storyID=2006-02-21T011732Z_01_N20345128_RTRUKOC_0_US-BIR DFLU-CONTAINMENT.xml

Edited by Rick
Back to Top
DarlMan View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member
Avatar

Joined: December 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 140
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DarlMan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2006 at 7:48am
The problem is that a successful containment of a H2H flu has never been done before.

Currently we are dealing with a virus that travels by bird.  We have not been able to contain the virus even when we know birds are spreading it.

How many countless number of birds have been culled in order to contain it?  Yet it is spreading faster now than ever before.

Therefore we know that no human transmitted flu has every been sucessfully contained, we also know that the current version of the BF has spread dispite the WHO's efforts.  That leads me to believe that a plan that relies on containment of a H2H strain of BF is beyond overly optimistic.


Edited by DarlMan
History shows again and again
How nature points out the folly of men
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2006 at 7:51am
Scientists expect bird flu repeats


Tuesday, February 21, 2006 (Excerpt)

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- Bird flu is likely to
cross over into people again and again if it ever even once acquires the
ability to pass from human to human, experts predicted on Monday.


In theory, the virus only has to mutate once, in one
person, to spark a pandemic. But the researchers argue that this could
happen again and again, in several places around the world.

They said even if the current pandemic killing birds passes, no one
should breathe a sign of relief because the threat to people will not be
gone.


http://edition.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/conditions/02/21/birdflu. containment.reut/index.html
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2006 at 7:53am
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2006 at 7:58am


I believe the act of culling in the third world without adequate precautions, has done nothing put fuel on the fire. If this is correct, we should soon see a rash of human illness in the coming weeks, in areas where culling has taken place.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2006 at 8:07am
It might also only need a swine cross-over not necessarily human first
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2006 at 8:29am
Originally posted by harpmandoodle harpmandoodle wrote:

It might also only need a swine cross-over not
necessarily human first



If that happens, it will take place in Uganada shortly,
because they are on a migratory route, and there is
an outbreak of "Swine Flu" there currently.

Authorities were concerned that the farmers were butchering and eating
the dying pigs. This gives creedance to the multiple hot-zone, recurring
pandemic theory.

There are millions of immune comprimised people in Africa. Pigs, Ducks,
Pigeons, Swans, Cats/Tigers, it only takes one.



Edited by Rick
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2006 at 9:16am

We may see 3 or 4 patient zeros because of multiple "hot zones".    Wave One of H2H - invisible tsunami.  

Back to Top
KatDoe67 View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member


Joined: February 02 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 234
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KatDoe67 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2006 at 9:22am

Honestly...I think letting it's run it's course UNCHECKED would bring about the LEAST amount of sickness and starvation and goverment upheaval. Better to just let it do it's thing and be DONE with it!

Popping up AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN, will be what does the most harm :-(

We have JUST enough resources and knowledge to make things worse :-( This will go on for YEARS before people work up enough immunity to it, to stop it from being a contant threat to them and those around them.

And in the end the poor will be poorer and the rich will be richer, and the USA's experiment with democracy will take more steps towards it's ultimate failure, because the people will all be screaming to the goverment to take care of them.

I'll bet the USA ends out with universal health care as well :-0 All those children with no health insurance! People have been burying their heads in the sand about our uninsured children for a LONG time. Hospitals FULL of kids who can't pay the inflated prices caused by those with insurance. What a mess! Never mind the adults who people feel like they can blame for being irresponsible. They too will be draining resources of our hospitals that are BUSINESSES first, and charities only when they can AFFORD to be :-0 You can't throw them ALL out on the streets to infect the richer people with insurance.

Yup...This is going to a BIGGER mess the more we do to try and stop it! I'm NOT saying we shouldn't try! I'm just stating...what I think the end reality will be of interfering with nature :-0

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2006 at 10:01am
Study: Containment Can't Stop Flu Pandemic


by UPI Wire
Feb 21, 2006

BOSTON, Feb. 20, 2006 (UPI) -- Scientists say they've
concluded containment might buy time, but is not enough to stop a flu
pandemic.


Through mathematical modeling, researchers at the Harvard School of
Public Health in Boston and Seattle's University of Washington show flu
outbreaks are likely to emerge in multiple locations and containment of
all outbreaks is improbable.

Based on the modeling, the scientists predict containment efforts could
likely double the time before a pandemic appears. But they say
containment should be just one element of a multi-pronged
preparedness strategy.

The work is part of a project aimed at developing modeling techniques to
understand the spread of infectious diseases, including pandemic flu.

The findings appear in PLoS Medicine online.


http://www.postchronicle.com/news/health/article_2127642.sht ml
Back to Top
Corn View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: December 13 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1219
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Corn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2006 at 10:56am
I agree with Katdoe67. encourage  governments and citizens to prep as much as they can and when it hits just let it run its course. build immunities. repeat. build more immunities.
Speculation is the only tool we have with a threat that can circle the globe in 30 days. Test results&news is slow.Factor in human conditions,politics, money&bingo!The truth!Facts come after the fact.
Back to Top
mightymouse View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: January 27 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 487
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mightymouse Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2006 at 11:25am

Rick quote above:

"The mortality in the United States would depend, at least initially, on how
well prepared hospitals are when the first patients come in for treatment.
Rigorous plans will have to be in place, otherwise it will rage through
hospitals on gloves, hands, equipment and uniforms."
 

KatDoe67 quote above:

Honestly...I think letting it's run it's course UNCHECKED would bring about the LEAST amount of sickness and starvation and goverment upheaval. Better to just let it do it's thing and be DONE with it!

Due to the ramifications of this whole BF thing I'm afraid I must agree with KatDoe67 and Corn.  If fighting it is futile, and a losing proposition - Get prepped - let it run it's course then pick up the pieces.  Just like a hurricane.  If there's no stopping it - accept it for what it is.  If a vaccine gets developed - yea ha!  

Nothing matters - Therefore everything matters
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2006 at 11:48am
I agree with all here give or take a tweek or two. The thought of the swine
cross-over in Uganda or near is worrying, but I have to say so is the UK. A
big swine industry and many 'free-range' farms in Yorkshire (East England)
and elsewhere. I think Uk has H5 already in swine from previous attacks (I
dont understand this H and N thing much) but Uk might be a place where
nobody expected it, just like always. Never where you expect!

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down