Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > Latest News
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Covid19 Numbers Not Correct
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

Covid19 Numbers Not Correct

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
FluMom View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group

Valued Member Since 2006

Joined: February 03 2020
Location: Colorado
Status: Offline
Points: 14695
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FluMom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Covid19 Numbers Not Correct
    Posted: May 08 2020 at 4:12pm

Nate Silver: 'Basic error' on coronavirus stories reveal media’s true goals

FiveThirtyEight editor Nate Silver said the mainstream media is not giving proper context to stories on the rise of coronavirus cases, which he calls a “basic error” that reveals an agenda to prioritize narratives that “sound smart” over accuracy and truth.

Silver was bothered that certain stories failed to mention that some growth in the coronavirus infection number is a result of an increase in testing.

“Not providing context on the increase in testing is such a basic error, and has been so widespread, that it's revealing about the media's goals. It's more interested in telling plausibly-true stories ("narratives") that sound smart to its audience than in accuracy/truth per se,” Silver said in response to author James Surowiecki calling out recent reports from Axios and The New York Times.


1,768 people are talking about this



REPORTER MOCKED AFTER URGING CITIZENS TO CALL 911 ON ICE CREAM MAN FOR ALLEGED CORONAVIRUS VIOLATION

“That doesn't mean it's just making stuff up or engaging in fake news,” Silver added. “On the contrary, the facts it relays are generally accurate in isolation. But the problems are in how facts are strung together and emphasized. Often there are sins of omission (e.g. no context on testing).”

Silver sent a third tweet noting that President Trump has “figured this out.”

“BTW, Trump has figured this out! By focusing on case counts, the media creates disincentives to do more testing because it makes the numbers look superficially worse. One reason (not the only one) why we're not pushing for testing as much as we should,” he wrote.


REPORT ON FACE MASKS' EFFECTIVENESS FOR COVID-19 DIVIDES SCIENTISTS


That doesn't mean it's just making stuff up or engaging in fake news. On the contrary, the facts it relays are generally accurate in isolation. But the problems are in how facts are strung together and emphasized. Often there are sins of omission (e.g. no context on testing).


258 people are talking about this




190 people are talking about this



CLICK HERE FOR COMPLETE CORONAVIRUS COVERAGE

Mediaite noticed that Axios updated its story after Silver’s criticism.

“The tweet prompted at least one outlet to update a story to acknowledge that increases in testing have led to more cases being diagnosed,” Mediaite’s Rudy Takala wrote. “Axios subsequently updated the story linked in the exchange, noting, ‘This story has been updated to clarify that increased testing could be part of the reason the number of cases in the U.S. is rising.’

Mediaite then pointed out, “The New York Times on Monday published a story containing similar claims, titled, ‘As Trump pushes to reopen, government sees virus toll nearly doubling.’”

Back to Top
EdwinSm, View Drop Down
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: April 03 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 24065
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote EdwinSm, Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2020 at 11:02pm

The latest Case Fatality rate for the USA has risen to just over 6%. [1,248,040 cases, 75,477 deaths].


This means that either the corvid-19 complications are now more deadly than the initial reports from China (suggesting around 0.67% for the Infection Fatality Rate); or that there is massive under-testing.


Using the IFR figures from China, one should multiply the confirmed cases by 9 to get an estimation of the true infection rate.  That means over 11,000,000 should have been infected.  Unfortunately, that is only about 3% of the population, so this little show has a long way to go. 

Of course if the IFR is higher (and data from Europe is pointing in that direction) then fewer people will have been infected than the above estimate shows, and this show has longer to run.

Back to Top
Pixie View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: June 05 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 19668
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pixie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2020 at 3:17pm
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down