Vaxx shedding was a woo woo conspiracy right?

Do vaccinated people shed their vaccine byproducts to us? We definitely, for sure, knew that vaccine shedding was not a thing, because “health experts and fact checkers” told us so. And we “believe science” and our “health experts”. Right?

Except that it is WRONG and vaccine shedding has just been proven by science!

Even I believed that there was no plausible mechanism for vaccine shedding. I thought that it was a baseless conspiracy theory. Stupid me. It turned out that I WAS WRONG and vaccine shedding is real and can be measured.

A study “Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity” was just released.

Evaluation of samples in this fashion revealed that high intranasal IgG in vaccinated parents was significantly associated (p-value = 0.01) with a 0.38 increase in the log transformed intranasal IgG gMFIs within a child from the same household (Fig 1F).

Let me try to explain it. First, these scientists from the University of Colorado looked at face masks, worn by vaccinated health care workers. They found that those workers shed antibodies generated by vaccination, and some antibodies got trapped in the masks and could be detected. This means that vaccinated people are literally “shedding” vaccine-caused antibodies.

Interested in that, scientists looked further: they compared unvaccinated children living with unvaccinated parents, to similarly unvaccinated children, but living with vaccinated parents.

It turned out that vaxxed parents actively shed vaccine-produced particles onto their children so that the kids acquired “humoral immunity” following shedding from their parents! Not only was this finding evident in the data, it actually was STRONGLY statistically significant with p-value of 0.01! This means that this was not a chance finding.

It remains to be explained WHY children have intranasal IgG. The authors seem to think that it is because of antibody shedding via droplets. In other words, they seem to propose that what is transferred is IgG itself in saliva droplets. They may be right. That said, there is a possibility that children DEVELOP intranasal IgG because other vaccine byproducts or exosomes are being shed.

It could even be due to lipid mRNA nanoparticles themselves shed and being transferred via saliva, like a virus. In fact, considering two replies to this article that I quoted at the bottom, mRNA lipid nanoparticle shedding is most likely. Why? Because the responders report experiencing STRONG IMMUNE REACTIONS.

Such byproducts would be CAUSING intranasal IgG in children as an immune reaction in children, rather than those IgGs being essentially mechanically spat from parents onto their children.

The article, while very interesting, is only the first step in researching vaccine shedding and I hope that further light will be shed (pun intended) on this phenomenon!

The authors, possibly in hopes of getting their article approved by science censors, call it a good thing:

Our results suggest that aerosol transmission of antibodies may also contribute to host protection and represent an entirely unrecognized mechanism by which passive immune protection may be communicated. Whether antibody transfer mediates host protection will be a function of exposure, but it seems reasonable to suggest, all things being equal, that any amount of antibody transfer would prove useful to the recipient host.

I am not sure if I can call it a good thing myself. Antibodies or mRNA nanoparticles from vaccines NOT approved by the FDA for children are being shed from parents to children, without consent or knowledge of either parents, or children. All of this is followed by denials by authorities.

Do you think that it is a good thing?

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/vaccine-shedding-finally-proven?s=r

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274443v1.full.pdf

[url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_shedding[/url] or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_shedding ; 

Vaccine shedding is a form of viral shedding^[1][2] which can occur following a viral infection caused by an attenuated (or "live virus") vaccine, which is a specific vaccine technology that uses an attenuated form of a live virus. Illness in others resulting from transmission through this type of viral shedding is rare.^[3][4] A large proportion of vaccines are not attenuated (live virus) vaccines,^[5] and therefore cannot cause vaccine-induced viral shedding.

The specific use of the term "vaccine shedding" has risen to public prominence through anti-vaccine activists linked to misinformation related to COVID-19, who erroneously claim that COVID-19 vaccination can cause individuals to shed coronavirus spike protein and affect menstruation and fertility in women exposed to them.^{[6][3][7][8][9]} However, the spike protein generated by vaccination does not shed, and there is no evidence to suggest that these vaccines cause menstruation and fertility problems.^[3][10] Vaccination also cannot cause shedding of the COVID-19 virus since none of the COVID-19 vaccines authorized for use by the FDA or the World Health Organization as of December 2021 are live-virus vaccines.^[11][12] Despite this, a COVID-19 "vaccine shedding" conspiracy theory has subsequently emerged, leading to vaccine hesitancy among some people.^[3][9][13]

Shedding is only possible, but even so, unlikely, with an attenuated vaccine, and it is impossible with other vaccine technologies such as inactivated vaccine (killed-virus vaccines), viral vector vaccine, RNA vaccines (that contain no virus),^[13] or subunit vaccines (a vaccine technology using only isolated proteins of a virus). Only a small number of vaccines use technology that contain live virus which can theoretically infect others. Nevertheless, not all pathogens are shed;shedding does not equal transmission^{[clarification needed]}; and transmission does not always cause disease.^{[citation needed]} With the exception of the oral polio vaccine (OPV), there have been no documented cases of vaccine-induced viral shedding that has infected contacts of a person vaccinated with an attenuated (live-virus) vaccine.^[14]

Occurrences[edit]

The only human vaccine to have caused any significant number of infections is the oral polio vaccine (OPV),^[15][16] which takes advantage of the contact immunity from shed vaccine virus to amplify the effectiveness of vaccination campaigns.^[17] However, under conditions of persistent circulation in undervaccinated populations, reversion mutations that reactivate the virus can give rise to disease-causing circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV) strains,^[18] and this vaccine is no longer used in developed countries.^[15] However, the OPV is still used in Asia and Africa, leading to a small number of vaccine-induced polio infections each year.^[19]

The route of infection is through contact with faeces, and some live vaccines, like the viruses they prevent, are shed in stool for up to 28 days.^[20] Normal hygiene is sufficient to prevent infection among healthy individuals,^[21] but immunocompromised individuals need to be especially diligent.^[22]

Other attenuated vaccines show no significant viral shedding, and inadvertent infection is rare.^[23] For example, only eleven cases of chickenpox transmission by vaccinated individuals have been documented out of approximately fifty million doses,^[24] and but a single documented case of influenza virus transmission, and that person remained asymptomatic.^[4]

The attenuated virus from vaccines is much weaker and less likely to infect than the wild virus.^[25]

In dogs, vaccine-induced viral shedding has been observed with live attenuated Canine parvovirus vaccines.^[26]

DJ [url]https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274443v1.full.pdf[/url] or https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274443v1.full.pdf ; "Abstract. Despite the obvious knowledge that infectious particles can be shared through respiration, whether other constituents of the nasal/oral fluids can be passed between hosts has surprisingly never even been postulated, let alone investigated. The circumstances of the present pandemic facilitated a unique opportunity to fully examine this provocative idea. The data we show provides evidence for a new mechanism by which herd immunity may be manifested, the aerosol transfer of antibodies between immune and non- immune hosts."

is one way of looking at it....The vaccinated would spread anti-bodies increasing herd immunity-even to those not asking for it...