Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > General Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Scotland: Failures highlight need for better data
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

Scotland: Failures highlight need for better data

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Scotland: Failures highlight need for better data
    Posted: April 12 2006 at 7:00am
     
Failure to identify Scotland’s H5N1 swan highlights need for better data
12-04-2006

UK Government officials have confirmed that the H5N1-positive swan discovered in Cellardyke, Scotland was a Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus, not as previously thought a Mute Swan Cygnus olor.

In contrast to the mainly resident/sedentary Mutes Swan, Whooper Swans are migratory. The Icelandic breeding population winters in North-west Europe, including Britain and Ireland, the low countries and the Baltic.

H5N1 was confirmed in several Whooper Swans in the Baltic during February and March.   “It seems plausible that the bird found in Scotland may have originated in this region and was attempting to migrate back to Iceland to breed, before becoming too sick to continue and alighting on the sea,” said Andre Farrer of the RSPB (BirdLife in the UK).

“However, it would be foolish at this stage, to dismiss the alternative theory that the swan was wintering in the UK, either in Fife or elsewhere, and contracted the virus locally from another species of waterfowl. For this reason the current restrictions should be kept in place and further surveillance of wild birds carried out”, he added.

It wouldn’t be acceptable to report that a mallard duck died of a virus yet reporting that a wild bird has died of H5N1 is often all the information that is released by public authorities —Dr Leon Bennun, BirdLife International’s Director of Policy

Initial identification in this instance had been hampered by the advanced state of decay of the carcass, and the species was only confirmed through DNA profiling. But according to Dr Leon Bennun, BirdLife International’s Director of Policy, studies of the aetiology of this disease world-wide have been held back by slack identification of the birds involved.

“It wouldn’t be acceptable to report that a mallard duck died of a virus yet reporting that a wild bird has died of H5N1 is often all the information that is released by public authorities”, Dr Bennun explained

“Better quality data collection, and reporting of both positive and negative avian influenza surveillance, are crucial to understanding general patterns in outbreaks, possible routes of transmission, and the potential impacts on migratory bird populations. This information can be used to focus contingency efforts, to predict future outbreaks, and to guide effective policy to reduce the economic and conservation impacts of avian influenza.”

BirdLife has prepared a document, Surveillance of wild birds, which provides guidance to on appropriate sampling, data collection and reporting strategies to monitor avian influenza in wild bird populations.

http://www.birdflubreakingnews.com/templates/birdflu/window.php?url=http://www.birdlife.org/news/news/2006/04/H5N1_swan.html
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down