Now tracking the new emerging South Africa Omicron Variant |
Testing, some ideas |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Tabitha111
Adviser Group Joined: January 11 2020 Location: Virginia Status: Offline Points: 11640 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: March 28 2020 at 9:07am |
by monotreme1000 March 28, 2020 A 2 trillion dollar stimulus package has just been passed. That's a lot of money. Any yet... We are asked to believe that a significant amount of testing for SARS2 still cannot be done because reagents are in short supply. Congress just allocated 2 trillion dollars and we can't figure out a way to make more plasticware or ramp up production of enzymes that were discovered decades ago. 2 trillion dollars. Not enough reagents for testing. 2 trillion dollars. Not enough reagents for testing. 2 trillion dollars. Not enough reagents for testing. These two sentences bother me in conjunction because they really don't make any sense. All the excuses I have heard for a lack of testing are unconvincing. And PCR is a technique I know something about. Now let's say we need more swabs. It's reported that we do. We could completely end the pandemic and start up the economy within a month if we tested everyone in the country. What would it cost to test everyone in the US? So, we are choosing to allow the virus to kill thousands of Americans (at least, maybe millions by the time this is done) What is the reason? They say "Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to incompetence." Well, maybe. But sometimes there really is malice. How much evidence do you need before concluding this? Here is something that bothers me: New York Times, April 22, 2019 According to the report, the cost of Social Security, the federal retirement program, will exceed its income in 2020 for the first time since 1982. The program’s reserve fund is projected to be depleted in 16 years, at which time recipients will get smaller payments than they are scheduled to receive if Congress does not act. Meanwhile, Medicare’s hospital insurance fund is expected to be depleted in 2026 — the same date that was projected a year ago. At that point, doctors, hospitals and nursing homes would not receive their full compensation from the program and patients could face more of the financial burden. No political party has addressed the huge costs of providing medical care for a rapidly aging population. No realistic solution has been even suggested. This is not just a problem in the US. Europe and Asia also have this problem, even worse. We are within a few years of a political nightmare. Unless... The pandemic preferentially kills older people and people with health issues. The people who need the most money from the government. The people who will complain if their benefits are cut. In 2 years, based on the current pandemic "plans", many of these people will be dead, either directly due to SARS2 infection or because hospitals have been overrun and can no longer provide care for the many other illnesses older people have. Has some one run the numbers on what happens if the virus is allowed to do its thing? And liked what they see? Not exactly a conspiracy theory. More like evil opportunism. Politicians could easily prove me wrong. Just test everyone. I know you can make that happen, if you want to. Not sure everyone will buy your excuses if this doesn't happen. I don't think I'm the only one wondering about your motives. Prove me wrong. |
|
'A man who does not think and plan long ahead will find trouble right at his door.'
--Confucius |
|
BabyCat
V.I.P. Member Joined: January 26 2020 Status: Offline Points: 15175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
LIHOP? Where have we seen that before? Hmmm... |
|
Newbie1A
Adviser Group Joined: January 26 2018 Location: Alberta Status: Offline Points: 11180 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
As I've said many times... what are the underlying or 'other' motivations for the (over) reaction to this virus... blaming the economic crash on Covid vs banksters/government? Kill off a large percentage of our senior population to save huge pension $$$'s that have been miss spent/miss managed by government? Cover up the coming planetary cool down and the food shortages this will entail (gets everyone used to 'rationing' etc)? Population control period? Is this all a giant social experiment - how far can the governments push us in name of fear? Is this just another step toward One World Order? Is this a giant 'dry test' to see where responses are hit hardest so that when the slate wiper comes along - we respond better? ????? So SO many theories - I like that others here think outside the box and don't necessarily just 'buy' all the tales the government is selling... time with hopefully expose the truth. |
|
If it's to be - it's up to me!
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |